From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E64DAC7EE25 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1q7BZj-0005MU-5u; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 09:04:59 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1q7BZh-0005MO-6K for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 09:04:57 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=bQ4hxpwi6OE6UTVICd0IkPx6VL5XPse1f31cPM2BFIE=; b=BAmSxJF2QqaEF0txZ5SkKXGdyp ydAcKe7IfMcm0zwlui6vvslrzOVoSdkoMY6g5a2xEmXyhcq+no+o7S/wMdHv+f7g2qc0YUUWEIZV8 GtlGsHucKwUSVZxnoJJtRt/7sVFvXvSXy2Jf4haW6npzAPjtH8/JdIt6x1lZe6rmtxMg=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=bQ4hxpwi6OE6UTVICd0IkPx6VL5XPse1f31cPM2BFIE=; b=aRdFQU8X/HTBwglmntVske90Ma i3+b8dDHW1LZfs7UySNsP6X1D+TQ74ks+iophRST4vysc5KLHWfIPfaijpGa9HAkWOz0gpWkM8W+2 5w+DwESFNDWtVexOSGEJV7nwKawxrlmRABKfByfGMHo8+3MDCL0g7rLX5z7T0k6RHpFc=; Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.95) id 1q7BZh-0004Mt-0Y for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 09:04:57 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id A178768AA6; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:04:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:04:44 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Phillip Potter Message-ID: <20230608090444.GA15075@lst.de> References: <20230606073950.225178-1-hch@lst.de> <20230606073950.225178-7-hch@lst.de> <20230608084129.GA14689@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Headers-End: 1q7BZh-0004Mt-0Y Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 06/31] cdrom: remove the unused mode argument to cdrom_release X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Chris Mason , dm-devel@redhat.com, "Md. Haris Iqbal" , Pavel Machek , Miquel Raynal , Jack Wang , Christoph Hellwig , linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Josef Bacik , Coly Li , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , David Sterba , Jens Axboe , Christian Brauner , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 09:47:27AM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote: > Yes indeed - I was under the impression it was appropriate for a > maintainer to signal their approval of a patch to maintained code using > a Signed-off-by tag due to their involvement in the submission process? > Apologies if I've got this wrong, happy to send Reviewed-bys by all > means. Signed-off-by is for the chain that the patches pass through. You add it when you apply or forward the patch. Just give me a Reviewed-by tag and say it shold apply to patches 1 to 6 and I'll add it. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel