From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Revert "f2fs: do not issue small discard commands during checkpoint"
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2023 22:25:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230730142552.3918623-2-chao@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230730142552.3918623-1-chao@kernel.org>
Previously, we have two mechanisms to cache & submit small discards:
a) set max small discard number in /sys/fs/f2fs/vdb/max_small_discards,
and checkpoint will cache small discard candidates w/ configured maximum
number.
b) call FITRIM ioctl, also, checkpoint in f2fs_trim_fs() will cache small
discard candidates w/ configured discard granularity, but w/o limitation
of number. FSTRIM interface is asynchronized, so it won't submit discard
directly.
Finally, discard thread will submit them in background periodically.
However, after commit 9ac00e7cef10 ("f2fs: do not issue small discard
commands during checkpoint"), the mechanism a) is broken, since no matter
how we configure the sysfs entry /sys/fs/f2fs/vdb/max_small_discards,
checkpoint will not cache small discard candidates any more.
echo 0 > /sys/fs/f2fs/vdb/max_small_discards
xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/file -c "pwrite 0 2m" -c "fsync"
xfs_io /mnt/f2fs/file -c "fpunch 0 4k"
sync
cat /proc/fs/f2fs/vdb/discard_plist_info |head -2
echo 100 > /sys/fs/f2fs/vdb/max_small_discards
rm /mnt/f2fs/file
xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/file -c "pwrite 0 2m" -c "fsync"
xfs_io /mnt/f2fs/file -c "fpunch 0 4k"
sync
cat /proc/fs/f2fs/vdb/discard_plist_info |head -2
Before the patch:
Discard pend list(Show diacrd_cmd count on each entry, .:not exist):
0 . . . . . . . .
Discard pend list(Show diacrd_cmd count on each entry, .:not exist):
0 3 1 . . . . . .
After the patch:
Discard pend list(Show diacrd_cmd count on each entry, .:not exist):
0 . . . . . . . .
Discard pend list(Show diacrd_cmd count on each entry, .:not exist):
0 . . . . . . . .
This patch reverts commit 9ac00e7cef10 ("f2fs: do not issue small discard
commands during checkpoint") in order to fix this issue.
Fixes: 9ac00e7cef10 ("f2fs: do not issue small discard commands during checkpoint")
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 6e5d1039ca76..1f0a25011687 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -2195,7 +2195,7 @@ void f2fs_clear_prefree_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
len = next_pos - cur_pos;
if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) ||
- !force || len < cpc->trim_minlen)
+ (force && len < cpc->trim_minlen))
goto skip;
f2fs_issue_discard(sbi, entry->start_blkaddr + cur_pos,
--
2.40.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-30 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-30 14:25 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: doc: fix description of max_small_discards Chao Yu
2023-07-30 14:25 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2023-08-17 15:21 ` Chao Yu
2023-08-18 21:29 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2023-08-21 19:50 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230730142552.3918623-2-chao@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).