* [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Require FMODE_WRITE for atomic write ioctls
@ 2024-08-06 14:07 Jann Horn via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-08-06 20:35 ` Eric Biggers
2024-08-07 11:37 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jann Horn via Linux-f2fs-devel @ 2024-08-06 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaegeuk Kim, Chao Yu; +Cc: Jann Horn, linux-kernel, stable, linux-f2fs-devel
The F2FS ioctls for starting and committing atomic writes check for
inode_owner_or_capable(), but this does not give LSMs like SELinux or
Landlock an opportunity to deny the write access - if the caller's FSUID
matches the inode's UID, inode_owner_or_capable() immediately returns true.
There are scenarios where LSMs want to deny a process the ability to write
particular files, even files that the FSUID of the process owns; but this
can currently partially be bypassed using atomic write ioctls in two ways:
- F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_REPLACE + F2FS_IOC_COMMIT_ATOMIC_WRITE can
truncate an inode to size 0
- F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE + F2FS_IOC_ABORT_ATOMIC_WRITE can revert
changes another process concurrently made to a file
Fix it by requiring FMODE_WRITE for these operations, just like for
F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE. Since any legitimate caller should only be using these
ioctls when intending to write into the file, that seems unlikely to break
anything.
Fixes: 88b88a667971 ("f2fs: support atomic writes")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
---
fs/f2fs/file.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 168f08507004..a662392c5d8b 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -2117,12 +2117,15 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write(struct file *filp, bool truncate)
struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode);
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
struct inode *pinode;
loff_t isize;
int ret;
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
+ return -EBADF;
+
if (!inode_owner_or_capable(idmap, inode))
return -EACCES;
if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -2225,12 +2228,15 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write(struct file *filp, bool truncate)
static int f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
{
struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
struct mnt_idmap *idmap = file_mnt_idmap(filp);
int ret;
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
+ return -EBADF;
+
if (!inode_owner_or_capable(idmap, inode))
return -EACCES;
ret = mnt_want_write_file(filp);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -2257,12 +2263,15 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
static int f2fs_ioc_abort_atomic_write(struct file *filp)
{
struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
struct mnt_idmap *idmap = file_mnt_idmap(filp);
int ret;
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
+ return -EBADF;
+
if (!inode_owner_or_capable(idmap, inode))
return -EACCES;
ret = mnt_want_write_file(filp);
if (ret)
return ret;
---
base-commit: b446a2dae984fa5bd56dd7c3a02a426f87e05813
change-id: 20240806-f2fs-atomic-write-e019a47823de
--
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Require FMODE_WRITE for atomic write ioctls
2024-08-06 14:07 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Require FMODE_WRITE for atomic write ioctls Jann Horn via Linux-f2fs-devel
@ 2024-08-06 20:35 ` Eric Biggers
2024-08-07 11:37 ` Chao Yu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Biggers @ 2024-08-06 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jann Horn; +Cc: Jaegeuk Kim, linux-kernel, stable, linux-f2fs-devel
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 04:07:16PM +0200, Jann Horn via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
> The F2FS ioctls for starting and committing atomic writes check for
> inode_owner_or_capable(), but this does not give LSMs like SELinux or
> Landlock an opportunity to deny the write access - if the caller's FSUID
> matches the inode's UID, inode_owner_or_capable() immediately returns true.
>
> There are scenarios where LSMs want to deny a process the ability to write
> particular files, even files that the FSUID of the process owns; but this
> can currently partially be bypassed using atomic write ioctls in two ways:
>
> - F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_REPLACE + F2FS_IOC_COMMIT_ATOMIC_WRITE can
> truncate an inode to size 0
> - F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE + F2FS_IOC_ABORT_ATOMIC_WRITE can revert
> changes another process concurrently made to a file
>
> Fix it by requiring FMODE_WRITE for these operations, just like for
> F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE. Since any legitimate caller should only be using these
> ioctls when intending to write into the file, that seems unlikely to break
> anything.
>
> Fixes: 88b88a667971 ("f2fs: support atomic writes")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/file.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
- Eric
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Require FMODE_WRITE for atomic write ioctls
2024-08-06 14:07 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Require FMODE_WRITE for atomic write ioctls Jann Horn via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-08-06 20:35 ` Eric Biggers
@ 2024-08-07 11:37 ` Chao Yu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2024-08-07 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jann Horn, Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: linux-kernel, stable, linux-f2fs-devel
On 2024/8/6 22:07, Jann Horn wrote:
> The F2FS ioctls for starting and committing atomic writes check for
> inode_owner_or_capable(), but this does not give LSMs like SELinux or
> Landlock an opportunity to deny the write access - if the caller's FSUID
> matches the inode's UID, inode_owner_or_capable() immediately returns true.
>
> There are scenarios where LSMs want to deny a process the ability to write
> particular files, even files that the FSUID of the process owns; but this
> can currently partially be bypassed using atomic write ioctls in two ways:
>
> - F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_REPLACE + F2FS_IOC_COMMIT_ATOMIC_WRITE can
> truncate an inode to size 0
> - F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE + F2FS_IOC_ABORT_ATOMIC_WRITE can revert
> changes another process concurrently made to a file
>
> Fix it by requiring FMODE_WRITE for these operations, just like for
> F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE. Since any legitimate caller should only be using these
> ioctls when intending to write into the file, that seems unlikely to break
> anything.
>
> Fixes: 88b88a667971 ("f2fs: support atomic writes")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-07 11:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-08-06 14:07 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Require FMODE_WRITE for atomic write ioctls Jann Horn via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-08-06 20:35 ` Eric Biggers
2024-08-07 11:37 ` Chao Yu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).