From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Require FMODE_WRITE for atomic write ioctls
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 13:35:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240806203553.GA2447@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240806-f2fs-atomic-write-v1-1-8a586e194fd7@google.com>
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 04:07:16PM +0200, Jann Horn via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
> The F2FS ioctls for starting and committing atomic writes check for
> inode_owner_or_capable(), but this does not give LSMs like SELinux or
> Landlock an opportunity to deny the write access - if the caller's FSUID
> matches the inode's UID, inode_owner_or_capable() immediately returns true.
>
> There are scenarios where LSMs want to deny a process the ability to write
> particular files, even files that the FSUID of the process owns; but this
> can currently partially be bypassed using atomic write ioctls in two ways:
>
> - F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_REPLACE + F2FS_IOC_COMMIT_ATOMIC_WRITE can
> truncate an inode to size 0
> - F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE + F2FS_IOC_ABORT_ATOMIC_WRITE can revert
> changes another process concurrently made to a file
>
> Fix it by requiring FMODE_WRITE for these operations, just like for
> F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE. Since any legitimate caller should only be using these
> ioctls when intending to write into the file, that seems unlikely to break
> anything.
>
> Fixes: 88b88a667971 ("f2fs: support atomic writes")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/file.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
- Eric
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-06 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-06 14:07 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Require FMODE_WRITE for atomic write ioctls Jann Horn via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-08-06 20:35 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2024-08-07 11:37 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240806203553.GA2447@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).