linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Require FMODE_WRITE for atomic write ioctls
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 13:35:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240806203553.GA2447@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240806-f2fs-atomic-write-v1-1-8a586e194fd7@google.com>

On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 04:07:16PM +0200, Jann Horn via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
> The F2FS ioctls for starting and committing atomic writes check for
> inode_owner_or_capable(), but this does not give LSMs like SELinux or
> Landlock an opportunity to deny the write access - if the caller's FSUID
> matches the inode's UID, inode_owner_or_capable() immediately returns true.
> 
> There are scenarios where LSMs want to deny a process the ability to write
> particular files, even files that the FSUID of the process owns; but this
> can currently partially be bypassed using atomic write ioctls in two ways:
> 
>  - F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_REPLACE + F2FS_IOC_COMMIT_ATOMIC_WRITE can
>    truncate an inode to size 0
>  - F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE + F2FS_IOC_ABORT_ATOMIC_WRITE can revert
>    changes another process concurrently made to a file
> 
> Fix it by requiring FMODE_WRITE for these operations, just like for
> F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE. Since any legitimate caller should only be using these
> ioctls when intending to write into the file, that seems unlikely to break
> anything.
> 
> Fixes: 88b88a667971 ("f2fs: support atomic writes")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/file.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

- Eric


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-06 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-06 14:07 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Require FMODE_WRITE for atomic write ioctls Jann Horn via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-08-06 20:35 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2024-08-07 11:37 ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240806203553.GA2447@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).