From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 216EFC87FD2 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 14:02:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.sourceforge.net; s=beta; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc: Reply-To:From:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:To:Date:Sender:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=mDoeXStWrwotMxIPFM4IzeialWxOGU4a+sw+s8BS/MY=; b=GWL9b5tlLjdhc9hSYsOYhLuOMy 2wLS+L1Y6+Zb5IWtKG8WHhQ92cUQOV+EZMTUw/+KBfBtbnZSMvU3Y20gZTfHr+qrsO+EmJH78sBYb 6Jlh67rKuVhaqMVphucWvcVwGL38KgSpB4+KjMOoiKT1uitszibEOYS1jPnzFc+bvuis=; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1ulT6f-0003pO-T6; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 14:02:34 +0000 Received: from [172.30.29.66] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1ulT6e-0003p7-Rt for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 14:02:33 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=g+wHT+PT93hDCFnxg5ehJ/knwkjGZnIt2PT+tfJfvuQ=; b=izTtOIrsUmrCcoiIQD3NqoKuH+ Pbj5ZZZjXZqfnjyJZ1CApTnSb08jWMeLE82OMDmVoh5H8dpkHD302p1x1Nn3uh5jjoUFxiO+5jd/U iCA7Ot42AAnzn60XRCRD4gVlWrkxl8MUFUw+3P8B8i0Zc7hEYWHYb7vfJQRZ/0xS2Sko=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=g+wHT+PT93hDCFnxg5ehJ/knwkjGZnIt2PT+tfJfvuQ=; b=koNdSJbNnvyq4b+HQm7NQhxp9D D7I0Wwhltqm141i9EtOqhWCX1yRjvdRYb9pJMJ9Jo53MDNoczmDyqQxXQXBZwWtDt2UlOEm661eQY Y0dHGd7f3Tap0kM79ccmRhd53cgaq2rhf7QrGq8RiAgozh/CTECy7/bqhzgbJYx5e3fk=; Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.95) id 1ulSge-0004e3-3k for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 13:35:40 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B001C45357; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 13:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E39DC4CEED; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 13:35:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1754919329; bh=JU+C8jrRoBvIHpuTBFOVPaJSBYeLJuKp6ZRbyTV8tUc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QanpJ1FFAEOTenI/ZExSMKMWz/vWwwP0RGPtT6qjmkKBX4nap9yqO0U3SmhN0mft7 0XEsDyKzmiQ3MPArUXx7Xibr1PndFK+QUTgL3JK9LaIVUhTreuZbdIBreTgk2CfMxQ Gm8/UGW+xYIDrCTnXv0I60EocErHUvb+5Kqq7DSDZ/mQ7zNKRfJUzcxUkMhzug1uD1 8bh6XQagbanat13424yqY1iXeT3fLg0pvOpA0uXXnszQuwLw3dGXGt6BbyRF22ekUs JmUCratJjiyWB9323y6oClHqu5I+dElILQ4KxZ59JBn8QQ28Rbay5gQFZ4RXLQSWSB iV0FOE4Xqmf/Q== Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 15:35:25 +0200 To: Eric Biggers Message-ID: <20250811-weismachen-anhieb-987a766c8e6e@brauner> References: <20250810075706.172910-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20250810170311.GA16624@sol> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250810170311.GA16624@sol> X-Headers-End: 1ulSge-0004e3-3k Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v5 00/13] Move fscrypt and fsverity info out of struct inode X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Christian Brauner via Linux-f2fs-devel Reply-To: Christian Brauner Cc: fsverity@lists.linux.dev, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Christoph Hellwig , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net > The fs-specific field solution from this patchset is much more efficient > than the rhashtable: efficient enough that we don't really have to worry > about it, regardless of fscrypt or fsverity. So I think it's a good > middle ground, and I'd like to just do it this way. I agree. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel