From: wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com>
To: <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, wangzijie1@honor.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, feng.han@honor.com
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: fix wrong extent_info data for precache extents
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 14:55:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250911065549.2929967-1-wangzijie1@honor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad627632-298e-428b-9cfa-a5b5b50c147e@kernel.org>
> On 9/10/25 21:58, wangzijie wrote:
> > When the data layout is like this:
> > dnode1: dnode2:
> > [0] A [0] NEW_ADDR
> > [1] A+1 [1] 0x0
> > ... ....
> > [1016] A+1016
> > [1017] B (B!=A+1017) [1017] 0x0
> >
> > We can build this kind of layout by following steps(with i_extra_isize:36):
> > ./f2fs_io write 1 0 1881 rand dsync testfile
> > ./f2fs_io write 1 1881 1 rand buffered testfile
> > ./f2fs_io fallocate 0 7708672 4096 testfile
> >
> > And when we map first data block in dnode2, we will get wrong extent_info data:
> > map->m_len = 1
> > ofs = start_pgofs - map->m_lblk = 1882 - 1881 = 1
> >
> > ei.fofs = start_pgofs = 1882
> > ei.len = map->m_len - ofs = 1 - 1 = 0
>
> Hi Zijie,
>
> I tried to reproduce w/ below steps:
>
> f2fs_io write 1 0 1881 rand dsync testfile
> f2fs_io write 1 1881 1 rand buffered testfile
> f2fs_io fallocate 0 7708672 4096 testfile
> umount
> mount
> f2fs_io precache_extents testfile
>
> f2fs_io-921 [013] ..... 1049.855817: f2fs_lookup_start: dev = (253,16), pino = 3, name:testfile, flags:65537
> f2fs_io-921 [013] ..... 1049.855870: f2fs_submit_read_bio: dev = (253,16)/(253,16), rw = READ(), DATA, sector = 139280, size = 4096
> f2fs_io-921 [013] ..... 1049.856116: f2fs_submit_folio_bio: dev = (253,16), ino = 1, folio_index = 0x5, oldaddr = 0x5553, newaddr = 0x5553, rw = READ(), type = HOT_NODE
> f2fs_io-921 [013] ..... 1049.856147: f2fs_submit_read_bio: dev = (253,16)/(253,16), rw = READ(), NODE, sector = 174744, size = 4096
> f2fs_io-921 [013] ..... 1049.856273: f2fs_iget: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, pino = 3, i_mode = 0x81ed, i_size = 7712768, i_nlink = 1, i_blocks = 15080, i_advise = 0x0
> f2fs_io-921 [013] ..... 1049.856305: f2fs_lookup_end: dev = (253,16), pino = 3, name:testfile, ino:5, err:0
> f2fs_io-921 [013] ..... 1049.856316: f2fs_lookup_extent_tree_start: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, pgofs = 0, type = Read
> f2fs_io-921 [013] ..... 1049.856317: f2fs_lookup_read_extent_tree_end: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, pgofs = 0, read_ext_info(fofs: 0, len: 512, blk: 1055744)
> f2fs_io-921 [013] ..... 1049.856317: f2fs_map_blocks: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, file offset = 0, start blkaddr = 0x101c00, len = 0x200, flags = 2, seg_type = 8, may_create = 0, multidevice = 0, flag = 6, err = 0
> f2fs_io-921 [013] ..... 1049.856318: f2fs_lookup_extent_tree_start: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, pgofs = 512, type = Read
> f2fs_io-921 [013] ..... 1049.856318: f2fs_lookup_read_extent_tree_end: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, pgofs = 512, read_ext_info(fofs: 0, len: 0, blk: 0)
> f2fs_io-921 [013] ..... 1049.856323: f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, pgofs = 512, len = 352, blkaddr = 18432, c_len = 0
> f2fs_io-921 [013] ..... 1049.856328: f2fs_submit_folio_bio: dev = (253,16), ino = 1, folio_index = 0x6, oldaddr = 0x5556, newaddr = 0x5556, rw = READ(), type = HOT_NODE
> f2fs_io-921 [013] ..... 1049.856329: f2fs_submit_read_bio: dev = (253,16)/(253,16), rw = READ(), NODE, sector = 174768, size = 4096
> f2fs_io-921 [021] ..... 1049.856968: f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, pgofs = 864, len = 160, blkaddr = 18784, c_len = 0
> f2fs_io-921 [021] ..... 1049.857002: f2fs_map_blocks: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, file offset = 512, start blkaddr = 0x4800, len = 0x200, flags = 2, seg_type = 8, may_create = 0, multidevice = 0, flag = 6, err = 0
> f2fs_io-921 [021] ..... 1049.857003: f2fs_lookup_extent_tree_start: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, pgofs = 1025, type = Read
> f2fs_io-921 [021] ..... 1049.857004: f2fs_lookup_read_extent_tree_end: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, pgofs = 1025, read_ext_info(fofs: 0, len: 0, blk: 0)
> f2fs_io-921 [021] ..... 1049.857010: f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, pgofs = 1025, len = 511, blkaddr = 19457, c_len = 0
> f2fs_io-921 [021] ..... 1049.857011: f2fs_map_blocks: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, file offset = 1025, start blkaddr = 0x4c01, len = 0x1ff, flags = 2, seg_type = 8, may_create = 0, multidevice = 0, flag = 6, err = 0
> f2fs_io-921 [021] ..... 1049.857012: f2fs_lookup_extent_tree_start: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, pgofs = 1537, type = Read
> f2fs_io-921 [021] ..... 1049.857012: f2fs_lookup_read_extent_tree_end: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, pgofs = 1537, read_ext_info(fofs: 0, len: 0, blk: 0)
> f2fs_io-921 [021] ..... 1049.857016: f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, pgofs = 1537, len = 344, blkaddr = 20993, c_len = 0
> f2fs_io-921 [021] ..... 1049.857016: f2fs_map_blocks: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, file offset = 1537, start blkaddr = 0x5201, len = 0x158, flags = 2, seg_type = 8, may_create = 0, multidevice = 0, flag = 6, err = 0
> f2fs_io-921 [021] ..... 1049.857017: f2fs_lookup_extent_tree_start: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, pgofs = 1882, type = Read
> f2fs_io-921 [021] ..... 1049.857017: f2fs_lookup_read_extent_tree_end: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, pgofs = 1882, read_ext_info(fofs: 0, len: 0, blk: 0)
> f2fs_io-921 [021] ..... 1049.857024: f2fs_submit_folio_bio: dev = (253,16), ino = 1, folio_index = 0x7, oldaddr = 0x5555, newaddr = 0x5555, rw = READ(), type = HOT_NODE
> f2fs_io-921 [021] ..... 1049.857026: f2fs_submit_read_bio: dev = (253,16)/(253,16), rw = READ(), NODE, sector = 174760, size = 4096
> f2fs_io-921 [021] ..... 1049.857156: f2fs_map_blocks: dev = (253,16), ino = 5, file offset = 1882, start blkaddr = 0x5201, len = 0x0, flags = 0, seg_type = 8, may_create = 0, multidevice = 0, flag = 6, err = 0
>
> It seems f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range() won't insert a zero-sized extent?
> Or am I missing something?
>
> Thanks,
Hi, Chao
I test it again with below steps:
./f2fs_io write 1 0 1881 rand dsync testfile
./f2fs_io fallocate 0 7708672 4096 testfile
./f2fs_io write 1 1881 1 rand buffered testfile
fsync testfile
umount
mount
./f2fs_io precache_extents testfile
f2fs_io-8749 [003] ..... 86.759281: f2fs_lookup_start: dev = (254,57), pino = 45485, name:testfile, flags:257
f2fs_io-8749 [003] ..... 86.759954: f2fs_iget: dev = (254,57), ino = 501391, pino = 45485, i_mode = 0x81ed, i_size = 7712768, i_nlink = 1, i_blocks = 15080, i_advise = 0x0
f2fs_io-8749 [003] ..... 86.759968: f2fs_lookup_end: dev = (254,57), pino = 45485, name:testfile, ino:501391, err:0
f2fs_io-8749 [003] ..... 86.760000: f2fs_lookup_extent_tree_start: dev = (254,57), ino = 501391, pgofs = 0, type = Read
f2fs_io-8749 [003] ..... 86.760020: f2fs_lookup_read_extent_tree_end: dev = (254,57), ino = 501391, pgofs = 0, read_ext_info(fofs: 0, len: 1881, blk: 3164707)
f2fs_io-8749 [003] ..... 86.760020: f2fs_map_blocks: dev = (254,57), ino = 501391, file offset = 0, start blkaddr = 0x304a23, len = 0x759, flags = 2, seg_type = 8, may_create = 0, multidevice = 0, flag = 6, err = 0
f2fs_io-8749 [003] ..... 86.760021: f2fs_lookup_extent_tree_start: dev = (254,57), ino = 501391, pgofs = 1881, type = Read
f2fs_io-8749 [003] ..... 86.760022: f2fs_lookup_read_extent_tree_end: dev = (254,57), ino = 501391, pgofs = 1881, read_ext_info(fofs: 0, len: 0, blk: 0)
f2fs_io-8749 [005] ..... 86.760162: f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range: dev = (254,57), ino = 501391, pgofs = 1881, len = 1, blkaddr = 2688335, c_len = 0
*****f2fs_io-8749 [005] ..... 86.760324: f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range: dev = (254,57), ino = 501391, pgofs = 1882, len = 0, blkaddr = 2688336, c_len = 0 ******
f2fs_io-8749 [005] ..... 86.760326: f2fs_map_blocks: dev = (254,57), ino = 501391, file offset = 1881, start blkaddr = 0x29054f, len = 0x1, flags = 2, seg_type = 8, may_create = 0, multidevice = 0, flag = 6, err = 0
inode:
i_ext: fofs:0 blkaddr:304a23 len:759
i_addr[0x9] [0x 304a23 : 3164707]
....
i_addr[0x368] [0x 304d82 : 3165570]
dnode1:
[0] [0x 304d83 : 3165571]
[1016] [0x 30517b : 3166587]
...
[1017] [0x 29054f : 2688335]
dnode2:
[0] NEW_ADDR
[1] [0x 0 : 0]
...
> >
> > Fix it by skipping updating this kind of extent info.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/data.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > index 7961e0ddf..b8bb71852 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -1649,6 +1649,9 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_map_blocks *map, int flag)
> >
> > switch (flag) {
> > case F2FS_GET_BLOCK_PRECACHE:
> > + if (__is_valid_data_blkaddr(map->m_pblk) &&
> > + start_pgofs - map->m_lblk == map->m_len)
> > + map->m_flags &= ~F2FS_MAP_MAPPED;
> > goto sync_out;
> > case F2FS_GET_BLOCK_BMAP:
> > map->m_pblk = 0;
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-11 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-10 13:58 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: fix wrong extent_info data for precache extents wangzijie
2025-09-10 13:58 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: fix infinite loop in __insert_extent_tree() wangzijie
2025-09-11 3:34 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: fix wrong extent_info data for precache extents Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-11 6:55 ` wangzijie [this message]
2025-09-11 7:47 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-11 7:42 ` wangzijie
2025-09-11 8:19 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-11 9:07 ` wangzijie
2025-09-12 1:52 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-12 3:36 ` wangzijie
2025-09-12 3:41 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-12 10:06 ` wangzijie
2025-09-12 10:38 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-12 10:48 ` wangzijie
2025-09-12 10:39 ` wangzijie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250911065549.2929967-1-wangzijie1@honor.com \
--to=wangzijie1@honor.com \
--cc=feng.han@honor.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).