From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 126A2C53219 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 05:50:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.sourceforge.net; s=beta; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc: Reply-To:From:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:To:Date:Sender:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=PY4xXV0XGNIhNWXLs4mNorKMutdhDuJd2re4vx4TFig=; b=kMG2oyTTdvceJkyCG693UaHUOX SVEOVDR6E3WTsjGB7efUc8hU1ElACDuKIAlG7qHmm0kYWKlLXhbC1JaZFRzL88cuiq6RqnPzTzoFz WVE/3kuLmaTzkW7kUjpcbKDtCXrQmPuS4O9nNHVD3I4Zhyyh+0L7I/XxUPrVVe0Gt04c=; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1woaiI-0000Bv-Ru; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 05:50:51 +0000 Received: from [172.30.29.66] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1woaiH-0000Bo-Ja for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 05:50:50 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7RSQlSZ74tUvUSC0pLiC2vJIgfUaYlvS5eLq7/7sfks=; b=SKQIXeGPe8Z0D1Sd0kWlhfcVlx S73miPF6u0Ylj0WX2UcuNbIBOGTs6Zf2xHMM2eg/NzOSHIM8EM60ublxgN8rVuGR+OodilOVQWu9I n1mdCrit0rhf7rjyEG6AFkyLPjDADjz/udW8PhXWEQSg4TQSVHnXJcCDxNpupG7wmtAA=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7RSQlSZ74tUvUSC0pLiC2vJIgfUaYlvS5eLq7/7sfks=; b=nDj5GuKDzdkDmBCWb4NHEcIdxk y1G/WS9GguZXjXukYM+9OpluC/nzFvDxB3wCCj6Lz7aXzrveKqlASaBTaG3E0GzZ0sOeABCjKeywz cT/iVAqahR20ciFJlFnDij/MArfUdjlPBp4moL2ra/jXxX8B+C5WNTczz3XoW+S4luRQ=; Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.95) id 1woaiF-00084X-P5 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 05:50:50 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E483960A62; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 05:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5175C1F000E9; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 05:50:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785217841; bh=7RSQlSZ74tUvUSC0pLiC2vJIgfUaYlvS5eLq7/7sfks=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=VKV0GyIjK0GL4FtieY77ZquJC4YCLVOOeIePgpFVQtZ9FE8QwEl3XkYUCBacc63Kd bhX5juOiJVyrnkYjGP4FCXg6+R6tiCKn6hlpoQY350cHeC56BcpWXV0ozB5l8dhdKH NGyExdX52ZCRm2DhlM/zqxWLMS2Ohsbt5pCYVgYbozmFx6GasQoqiKVbmLmIqH7wfJ nSGTo/mn0kEWS1Z/uqitZTNAzSnJeOtzH1gMBBcqHFPWeJxt55V79/js1dowNtioQH Hu1bT/qlVCKKKPqafvWZsCPKTqZByyk7xQ52ChMJWjlOQKTbSgYMoFdgXSZVCLknTJ muZQaurdChR/A== Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 22:48:47 -0700 To: Daniel Vacek Message-ID: <20260728054847.GB99797@sol> References: <20260724133328.1837318-1-neelx@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Headers-End: 1woaiF-00084X-P5 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 00/12] fstests: introduce fscrypt support for btrfs X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel Reply-To: Eric Biggers Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, zlang@redhat.com, fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Christoph Hellwig , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, David Sterba , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 07:44:37AM +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 at 05:19, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 03:33:16PM +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote: > > > This is a rebase and cleanup of older patches [0] from Sweet Tea and Josef > > > fixed to work with the recent kernel and btrfs-progs changes. > > > > I'm not sure if you post this just for reference or what the intent here > > is, especially with a cover letter like this that doesn't have much > > information. > > > > Before we doing anything for the btrfs-specific fscrypt changes in > > xfstests, those changes should be accepted upstream first. > > > > Maybe some thing like splitting tests might make sense without that, > > but then it should be posted separately. > > Hi Christoph. Thanks for looking into this. > > Yeah, I could have been more verbose, perhaps also using an RFC tag. I > wanted to get feedback and a review from a wider audience to see if > this is a viable direction. This is currently the base for my btrfs > fscrypt development testing. > Especially for upstream fscrypt changes, when sending those patches I > was asked about tests support. I understand to keep fstests OOT as > long as the kernel part is in development. But at the same time I'd > like to make fstests complement the kernel part and ensure they are > ready and available for everyone throughout the process. Kinda to > "bundle" them all the next iteration. > > Would you suggest otherwise? Please keep sending out the tests along with the kernel patches. But yes, they aren't for immediate merging and should be tagged with RFC, and the cover letter should mention that the kernel patches are pending. Thanks! - Eric _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel