linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Liao Yuanhong <liaoyuanhong@vivo.com>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	"open list:F2FS FILE SYSTEM"
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: Enhance the subsequent logic of valid_thresh_ratio to prevent unnecessary background GC
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 14:43:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21aefe8c-b737-41ea-9efc-9390b6a23c76@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c2c7fbdb-f71c-46aa-a47d-8bd4bec688d4@vivo.com>

On 9/20/25 10:49, Liao Yuanhong wrote:
> 
> On 9/18/2025 10:16 AM, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 9/17/25 16:13, Liao Yuanhong wrote:
>>> On 9/17/2025 3:57 PM, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> On 9/17/25 15:08, Liao Yuanhong wrote:
>>>>> On 9/15/2025 4:36 PM, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/9/25 21:44, Liao Yuanhong wrote:
>>>>>>> When the proportion of dirty segments within a section exceeds the
>>>>>>> valid_thresh_ratio, the gc_cost of that section is set to UINT_MAX,
>>>>>>> indicating that these sections should not be released. However, if all
>>>>>>> section costs within the scanning range of get_victim() are UINT_MAX,
>>>>>>> background GC will still occur. Add a condition to prevent this situation.
>>>>>> For this case, f2fs_get_victim() will return 0, and f2fs_gc() will use unchanged
>>>>>> segno for GC?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> You're right, segno won't update in this scenario, and this patch feature is redundant.
>>>> Oh, I meant, if f2fs_get_victim() fails to select a valid victim due to the reason you
>>>> described, f2fs_get_victim() will return 0, and f2fs_gc() will migrate segment #NULL_SEGNO?
>>>> Or am I missing something?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>> Yes. In this scenario, since it won't enter the|p.min_cost > cost|condition,|p.min_segno|will retain its initial value|||NULL_SEGNO|. This is consistent with what you described.
>> Do you have a script to reproduce this bug?
>>
>> Thanks,
> 
> I didn't explain it clearly. What I mean is that this patch is redundant, the original code is fine.

Oh, I see. I don't see any problem in f2fs_get_victim() as well.

Thanks,

> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Liao
> 
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Liao
>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Liao
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Liao Yuanhong <liaoyuanhong@vivo.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>     fs/f2fs/gc.c | 5 +++++
>>>>>>>     1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>>>>>> index 4a8c08f970e3..ffc3188416f4 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>>>>>> @@ -936,6 +936,11 @@ int f2fs_get_victim(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int *result,
>>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>>     +    if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) && p.min_cost == UINT_MAX) {
>>>>>>> +        ret = -ENODATA;
>>>>>>> +        goto out;
>>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>         /* get victim for GC_AT/AT_SSR */
>>>>>>>         if (is_atgc) {
>>>>>>>             lookup_victim_by_age(sbi, &p);



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2025-09-23  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-09 13:44 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 0/2] f2fs: Some optimizations for background GC in Zoned UFS Liao Yuanhong via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-09 13:44 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: Optimize excessive write operations caused by continuous background garbage collection " Liao Yuanhong via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-15  8:25   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-16  2:28   ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-17  7:15     ` Liao Yuanhong via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-09 13:44 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: Enhance the subsequent logic of valid_thresh_ratio to prevent unnecessary background GC Liao Yuanhong via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-15  8:36   ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-17  7:08     ` Liao Yuanhong via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-17  7:57       ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-17  8:13         ` Liao Yuanhong via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-18  2:16           ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-20  2:49             ` Liao Yuanhong via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-23  6:43               ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21aefe8c-b737-41ea-9efc-9390b6a23c76@kernel.org \
    --to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=liaoyuanhong@vivo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).