From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6412AC10F14 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB792083B; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="m/2KpZn4"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="Td7X8nr8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2EB792083B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKJsC-00007z-Qk; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:16:12 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKJsB-00007R-7S for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:16:11 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:To:References:CC:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aRAU3Mh+NyIe7t1CCz3rPQYPA43BeJR2uaR3LbC64U8=; b=m/2KpZn4zilbL5P6V8NNHLv/mw VlRHQ+82RbtPoTfFGWMhkVOLCitGp02C8fPfpIrbKjIH3ahN4Fxv4wWVs9ZvGfHcJn3iLJPJtLS9+ 3lGFMUNu+w8I0H2fad6pf2Vwwz+r6vI/MH41Cf2kDTvoiA0PfieN1RdmIcUsSt5qPHow=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:To:References:CC:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aRAU3Mh+NyIe7t1CCz3rPQYPA43BeJR2uaR3LbC64U8=; b=Td7X8nr8KkgBqm0Zn7QoZDycqc OOu68OuFywJlz7Nor7mYJ+hmnEBIqQjbem23CtTaq6YmLFimwrtsJlDrguhFofPB7jBBnmuv4Rtdk sJjudhBhaBd0LYcyWytGZao5YIM5GXq/4bTrhSjc8WG54QiTEiA19P2dWc9+M7A50LhA=; Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1iKJs9-009yiR-KO for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:16:11 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS411-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 91664438C1179D91CE27; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:16:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:15:58 +0800 References: <20191015100938.123519-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> To: Jaegeuk Kim From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <22384b38-7334-ec2c-0bfc-5af14436b374@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:15:59 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191015100938.123519-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1iKJs9-009yiR-KO Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] common/defrag: support f2fs X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guaneryu@gmail.com, fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Jaegeuk, do you have time to check these two patches which are trying to adjust defrag/casefold testcase for f2fs? On 2019/10/15 18:09, Chao Yu wrote: > F2FS supports defragment based on file granularity, adjust test suit > to support f2fs. > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > --- > v2: > - use local variable in function > common/config | 2 ++ > common/defrag | 11 ++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/common/config b/common/config > index a0d58bde..22592cec 100644 > --- a/common/config > +++ b/common/config > @@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ export XFS_COPY_PROG="$(type -P xfs_copy)" > export FSTRIM_PROG="$(type -P fstrim)" > export DUMPE2FS_PROG="$(type -P dumpe2fs)" > export RESIZE2FS_PROG="$(type -P resize2fs)" > +export F2FS_IO_PROG="$(type -P f2fs_io)" > export FIO_PROG="$(type -P fio)" > export FILEFRAG_PROG="$(type -P filefrag)" > export E4DEFRAG_PROG="$(type -P e4defrag)" > @@ -242,6 +243,7 @@ case "$HOSTOS" in > export MKFS_BTRFS_PROG=$(set_mkfs_prog_path_with_opts btrfs) > export MKFS_F2FS_PROG=$(set_mkfs_prog_path_with_opts f2fs) > export DUMP_F2FS_PROG=$(type -P dump.f2fs) > + export F2FS_IO_PROG=$(type -P f2fs_io) > export BTRFS_UTIL_PROG=$(type -P btrfs) > export BTRFS_SHOW_SUPER_PROG=$(type -P btrfs-show-super) > export BTRFS_CONVERT_PROG=$(type -P btrfs-convert) > diff --git a/common/defrag b/common/defrag > index 2bd739c0..1381a4dd 100644 > --- a/common/defrag > +++ b/common/defrag > @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ _require_defrag() > rm -f $testfile $donorfile 2>&1 > /dev/null > DEFRAG_PROG="$E4DEFRAG_PROG" > ;; > + f2fs) > + DEFRAG_PROG="$F2FS_IO_PROG defrag_file" > + ;; > btrfs) > DEFRAG_PROG="$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem defragment" > ;; > @@ -140,7 +143,13 @@ _defrag() > > [ ! -z $csum ] && CSUM_BEFORE=`md5sum $1` > STAT_BEFORE=`stat -c "a: %x m: %y c: %z" $1` > - $DEFRAG_PROG -v $1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > + > + if [ $FSTYP == "f2fs" ]; then > + local filesize=`ls -l $1 | $AWK_PROG '{print $5}'` > + $DEFRAG_PROG 0 $filesize $1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > + else > + $DEFRAG_PROG -v $1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 > + fi > > _scratch_cycle_mount > STAT_AFTER=`stat -c "a: %x m: %y c: %z" $1` > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel