From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chandan Rajendra Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Consolidate Post read processing code Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:02:03 +0530 Message-ID: <2420837.hecoV8S9Z6@localhost.localdomain> References: <20190218100433.20048-1-chandan@linux.ibm.com> <20190220004107.GI12177@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gwoS8-0007EJ-0s for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:31:52 +0000 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5] helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1gwoS6-00EM0N-0w for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:31:51 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x1LDUKSn050932 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:31:41 -0500 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qsum63ra7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:31:40 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:31:39 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20190220004107.GI12177@gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Eric Biggers Cc: tytso@mit.edu, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 6:11:07 AM IST Eric Biggers wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 03:34:23PM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote: > > Based on the reviews provided for this patchset, I > > will change F2FS to use mpage_readpage[s] and post the next version of > > this patchset to linux-fsdevel mailing list. > > Is that really possible? F2FS has other functionality in its ->readpages(), > such as support for filesystems that use multiple block devices. > Hmm. I didn't know that. Thanks for pointing that out. I will read up that code and if it isn't really possible to get F2FS to use mpage_readpage[s](), then I would limit the patchset to Ext4. -- chandan