From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Abinash Singh <abinashlalotra@gmail.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com,
syzbot+b8c1d60e95df65e827d4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix KMSAN uninit-value in extent_info usage
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:19:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29dac4f4-3f46-49b6-8a9f-c26ffcde11d0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250624170948.59013-1-abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
On 6/25/25 01:09, Abinash Singh wrote:
> KMSAN reported a use of uninitialized value in `__is_extent_mergeable()`
> and `__is_back_mergeable()` via the read extent tree path.
>
> The root cause is that `get_read_extent_info()` only initializes three
> fields (`fofs`, `blk`, `len`) of `struct extent_info`, leaving the
> remaining fields uninitialized. This leads to undefined behavior
> when those fields are accessed later, especially during
> extent merging.
>
> Fix it by zero-initializing the `extent_info` struct before population.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+b8c1d60e95df65e827d4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b8c1d60e95df65e827d4
> Fixes: a28ef1f5aebe ("f2fs: maintain extent cache in separated file")
Should use this instead?
Fixes: 94afd6d6e525 ("f2fs: extent cache: support unaligned extent")
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Thanks,
> Signed-off-by: Abinash Singh <abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
> ---
> v3 : Added Fixes and Closes tags
> ---
> fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> index cfe925a3d555..4ce19a310f38 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ void f2fs_init_read_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, struct folio *ifolio)
> struct f2fs_extent *i_ext = &F2FS_INODE(&ifolio->page)->i_ext;
> struct extent_tree *et;
> struct extent_node *en;
> - struct extent_info ei;
> + struct extent_info ei = {0};
>
> if (!__may_extent_tree(inode, EX_READ)) {
> /* drop largest read extent */
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-25 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-19 12:09 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix KMSAN uninit-value in extent_info usage Abinash Singh
2025-06-24 14:16 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-06-24 17:09 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] " Abinash Singh
2025-06-25 2:19 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2025-06-25 11:05 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4] " Abinash Singh
2025-07-09 18:10 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29dac4f4-3f46-49b6-8a9f-c26ffcde11d0@kernel.org \
--to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=abinashlalotra@gmail.com \
--cc=abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+b8c1d60e95df65e827d4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).