From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Yongpeng Yang <monty_pavel@sina.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry flag usage
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 16:39:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c04a285-7161-4e4c-884e-ca96bb818d3b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310093611.2865092-4-monty_pavel@sina.com>
On 3/10/26 17:36, Yongpeng Yang wrote:
> From: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>
>
> f2fs_need_dentry_mark() reads nat_entry flags without mutual exclusion
> with the checkpoint path, which can result in an incorrect inode block
> marking state. The scenario is as follows:
>
> create & write & fsync 'file A' write checkpoint
> - f2fs_do_sync_file // inline inode
> - f2fs_write_inode // inode folio is dirty
> - f2fs_write_checkpoint
> - f2fs_flush_merged_writes
> - f2fs_sync_node_pages
> - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // no dirty node
> - f2fs_need_inode_block_update // return true
> - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // inode dirtied
> - f2fs_need_dentry_mark //return true
> - f2fs_flush_nat_entries
> - f2fs_write_checkpoint end
> - __write_node_folio // inode with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set
> SPO, "fsck --dry-run" find inode has already checkpointed but still
> with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set
>
> The state observed by f2fs_need_dentry_mark() can differ from the state
> observed in __write_node_folio() after acquiring sbi->node_write. The
> root cause is that the semantics of IS_CHECKPOINTED and
> HAS_FSYNCED_INODE are only guaranteed after the checkpoint write has
> fully completed.
>
> This patch moves set_dentry_mark() into __write_node_folio() and
> protects it with the sbi->node_write lock.
>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Fixes: 88bd02c9472a ("f2fs: fix conditions to remain recovery information in f2fs_sync_file")
> Signed-off-by: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 9:36 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 0/2] f2fs: fix data consistency issue caused by nat_entry flag Yongpeng Yang
2026-03-10 9:36 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry flag usage Yongpeng Yang
2026-03-11 8:39 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2026-03-11 18:16 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-12 1:13 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-12 4:01 ` Yongpeng Yang
2026-03-10 9:36 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: fix data loss caused by incorrect use of nat_entry flag Yongpeng Yang
2026-03-11 8:48 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-03-24 17:32 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 0/2] f2fs: fix data consistency issue caused by " patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3c04a285-7161-4e4c-884e-ca96bb818d3b@kernel.org \
--to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=monty_pavel@sina.com \
--cc=yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox