From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: wait on atomic writes to count
 F2FS_CP_WB_DATA
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 17:31:52 +0800
Message-ID: <3e50bcd6-1730-c28d-2d28-7a8e57f456cf@huawei.com>
References: <20190104042025.31982-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190104042025.31982-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net

On 2019/1/4 12:20, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Otherwise, we can get wrong counts incurring checkpoint hang.
> 
> IO_W (CP:  -24, Data:   24, Flush: (   0    0    1), Discard: (   0    0))
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>

Good catch! ;)

I can understand this condition, but for other new developer who reads this
commit, it will be a little hard to understand situation here.

How about explaining a little more about problem here, maybe:

Thread A			Thread B		
- f2fs_write_data_pages
 -  __write_data_page
  - f2fs_submit_page_write
   - inc_page_count(F2FS_WB_DATA)
     type is F2FS_WB_DATA due to file is non-atomic one
- f2fs_ioc_start_atomic_write
 - set_inode_flag(FI_ATOMIC_FILE)
				- f2fs_write_end_io
				 - dec_page_count(F2FS_WB_CP_DATA)
				   type is F2FS_WB_DATA due to file becomes
				   atomic one

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>

Thanks,