linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] mkfs.f2fs: update allocation policy for ro feature
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 06:57:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45e56fa9-de7a-7858-f032-4433adb2b021@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YzXjrn7oZzVmUz/n@google.com>

On 2022/9/30 2:27, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 09/28, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2022/9/28 11:15, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 09/28, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> On 2022/9/28 0:40, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>> On 09/25, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>> Update allocation policy for ro feature:
>>>>>> - hot_data: allocating blocks by LBA ascending order
>>>>>> - hot_node: allocating blocks by LBA descending order
>>>>>
>>>>> This will increase the RO image size.
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't RO image has fixed-size during mkfs?
>>>
>>> First run gives the reduced size information, and second round makes the image
>>> with the required size.
>>
>> I didn't get it, in which step it may increase the RO image size?
>>
>> IIUC, after we apply this patch, reduced size information won't change due
>> to that after sload in first run, total used block count should be fixed?
> 
> First run fills the data and leaves the maximum LBA touched in the image. Then,

How about caclulating required size w/ total used blocks rather than maximum LBA?

Thanks,

> it'll resize the image file and run again with the smallest image.
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     mkfs/f2fs_format.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/mkfs/f2fs_format.c b/mkfs/f2fs_format.c
>>>>>> index 40ac589..8d0f410 100644
>>>>>> --- a/mkfs/f2fs_format.c
>>>>>> +++ b/mkfs/f2fs_format.c
>>>>>> @@ -544,10 +544,10 @@ static int f2fs_prepare_super_block(void)
>>>>>>     	}
>>>>>>     	if (c.feature & cpu_to_le32(F2FS_FEATURE_RO)) {
>>>>>> -		c.cur_seg[CURSEG_HOT_NODE] = 0;
>>>>>> +		c.cur_seg[CURSEG_HOT_NODE] = last_section(last_zone(total_zones));
>>>>>>     		c.cur_seg[CURSEG_WARM_NODE] = 0;
>>>>>>     		c.cur_seg[CURSEG_COLD_NODE] = 0;
>>>>>> -		c.cur_seg[CURSEG_HOT_DATA] = 1;
>>>>>> +		c.cur_seg[CURSEG_HOT_DATA] = 0;
>>>>>>     		c.cur_seg[CURSEG_COLD_DATA] = 0;
>>>>>>     		c.cur_seg[CURSEG_WARM_DATA] = 0;
>>>>>>     	} else if (c.heap) {
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> 2.36.1


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-29 22:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-25  5:58 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] mkfs.f2fs: update allocation policy for ro feature Chao Yu
2022-09-27 16:40 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-09-28  1:48   ` Chao Yu
2022-09-28  3:15     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-09-28 11:59       ` Chao Yu
2022-09-29 18:27         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-09-29 22:57           ` Chao Yu [this message]
2022-09-30 22:33             ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-10-01  0:26               ` Chao Yu
2022-10-03  1:06                 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-10-06 15:22                   ` Chao Yu
2022-09-28  2:11   ` [f2fs-dev] 答复: " zhangqilong via Linux-f2fs-devel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45e56fa9-de7a-7858-f032-4433adb2b021@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).