From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: jtp.park@samsung.com, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Jeongtae Park <jeongtae.park@gmail.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add scope based f2fs_putname() cleanup
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:32:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a79eea2-e360-493d-8c98-d93aacbd4d00@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240611233906.2873639-1-jtp.park@samsung.com>
On 2024/6/12 7:39, jtp.park@samsung.com wrote:
> From: Jeongtae Park <jtp.park@samsung.com>
>
> This patch adds a new scope based f2fs_putname() cleanup to reduce
> the chances of forgetting a f2fs_putname(). And doing so removes
Actually, f2fs_trace_rw_file_path() won't change frequently, so the risk
of forgetting f2fs_putname() here is very low.
> a goto statement for error handling.
The code logic is fine to me, but not sure whether we should apply this.
Jaegeuk, any comments?
Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeongtae Park <jtp.park@samsung.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 ++
> fs/f2fs/file.c | 8 +++-----
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 1974b6aff397..284024c12ee5 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -3402,6 +3402,8 @@ static inline void f2fs_putname(char *buf)
> __putname(buf);
> }
>
> +DEFINE_FREE(f2fs_putname, void *, if (_T) f2fs_putname(_T))
> +
> static inline void *f2fs_kzalloc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> {
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index 5c0b281a70f3..c783d017ed28 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -4511,22 +4511,20 @@ static void f2fs_trace_rw_file_path(struct file *file, loff_t pos, size_t count,
> int rw)
> {
> struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> - char *buf, *path;
> + char *buf __free(f2fs_putname) = f2fs_getname(F2FS_I_SB(inode));
> + char *path;
>
> - buf = f2fs_getname(F2FS_I_SB(inode));
> if (!buf)
> return;
> path = dentry_path_raw(file_dentry(file), buf, PATH_MAX);
> if (IS_ERR(path))
> - goto free_buf;
> + return;
> if (rw == WRITE)
> trace_f2fs_datawrite_start(inode, pos, count,
> current->pid, path, current->comm);
> else
> trace_f2fs_dataread_start(inode, pos, count,
> current->pid, path, current->comm);
> -free_buf:
> - f2fs_putname(buf);
> }
>
> static ssize_t f2fs_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-18 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20240611234050epcas2p40bd72d91c6a7b67e411a5ebfcddbcb97@epcas2p4.samsung.com>
2024-06-11 23:39 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add scope based f2fs_putname() cleanup jtp.park
2024-06-18 1:32 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2024-06-24 17:47 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4a79eea2-e360-493d-8c98-d93aacbd4d00@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jeongtae.park@gmail.com \
--cc=jtp.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).