From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: liujinbao1 <jinbaoliu365@gmail.com>, jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>,
Sheng Yong <shengyong1@xiaomi.com>,
liujinbao1 <liujinbao1@xiaomi.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs-tools: detect and fix NAT entry inconsistencies with dent_flag set
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 09:32:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b79827c-a199-4978-bcdc-76af19190606@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251231105219.2679546-1-jinbaoliu365@gmail.com>
On 12/31/2025 6:52 PM, liujinbao1 wrote:
> From: liujinbao1 <liujinbao1@xiaomi.com>
>
> During SPO tests, when mounting F2FS, an -EINVAL error was returned.
> The issue originates from the f2fs_recover_inode_page function's
> check, where old_ni.blk_addr != NULL_ADDR under the conditions of
> IS_INODE(folio) && is_dent_dnode(folio).
> Add detection and repair for this scenario in fsck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sheng Yong <shengyong1@xiaomi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jinbao Liu <liujinbao1@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> fsck/mount.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fsck/node.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fsck/mount.c b/fsck/mount.c
> index f03fa2d..07b8e6e 100644
> --- a/fsck/mount.c
> +++ b/fsck/mount.c
> @@ -3881,6 +3881,7 @@ int f2fs_find_fsync_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *head)
>
> while (1) {
> struct fsync_inode_entry *entry;
> + struct f2fs_nat_entry nat_entry;
>
> if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, blkaddr, META_POR))
> break;
> @@ -3897,6 +3898,29 @@ int f2fs_find_fsync_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *head)
>
> entry = get_fsync_inode(head, ino_of_node(node_blk));
> if (!entry) {
> + if (IS_INODE(node_blk) && is_dent_dnode(node_blk)) {
> + get_nat_entry(sbi, ino_of_node(node_blk), &nat_entry);
> + if (nat_entry.block_addr != NULL_ADDR) {
is_valid_data_blkaddr(nat_entry.block_addr)?
> + if (!c.fix_on)
> + ASSERT_MSG("ino: %u is_dent:%d nat entry blkaddr is %#X\n",
> + ino_of_node(node_blk), is_dent_dnode(node_blk),
> + nat_entry.block_addr);
Should call ASSERT_MSG() first to print log and set c.bug_on, then
check c.fix_on?
> + else if (f2fs_dev_is_writable()) {
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + ASSERT_MSG("Set node_blk %#x fsync flag [%u] -> [0]"
> + " next_blkaddr [%#x] -> [NULL_ADDR]\n",
> + blkaddr, is_fsync_dnode(node_blk),
> + F2FS_NODE_FOOTER(node_blk)->next_blkaddr);
FIX_MSG("Set node_blk...")?
> + F2FS_NODE_FOOTER(node_blk)->next_blkaddr = NULL_ADDR;
> + set_fsync_mark(node_blk, 0);
I suspect that DENT_BIT_SHIFT is set incorrectly? So can we just clear DENT_BIT_SHIFT,
and continue to recovery this inode block?
Thanks,
> + ret = dev_write_block(node_blk, blkaddr,
> + f2fs_io_type_to_rw_hint(CURSEG_WARM_NODE));
> + ASSERT(ret >= 0);
> + goto next;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> entry = add_fsync_inode(head, ino_of_node(node_blk));
> if (!entry) {
> err = -1;
> diff --git a/fsck/node.h b/fsck/node.h
> index 19f1e57..7c16cc8 100644
> --- a/fsck/node.h
> +++ b/fsck/node.h
> @@ -173,6 +173,20 @@ static inline void set_cold_node(struct f2fs_node *rn, bool is_dir)
> F2FS_NODE_FOOTER(rn)->flag = cpu_to_le32(flag);
> }
>
> +static inline void set_mark(struct f2fs_node *rn, int mark, int type)
> +{
> + unsigned int flag = le32_to_cpu(F2FS_NODE_FOOTER(rn)->flag);
> +
> + if (mark)
> + flag |= (1 << type);
> + else
> + flag &= ~(1 << type);
> + F2FS_NODE_FOOTER(rn)->flag = cpu_to_le32(flag);
> +}
> +
> +#define set_dentry_mark(page, mark) set_mark(page, mark, DENT_BIT_SHIFT)
> +#define set_fsync_mark(page, mark) set_mark(page, mark, FSYNC_BIT_SHIFT)
> +
> #define is_fsync_dnode(node_blk) is_node(node_blk, FSYNC_BIT_SHIFT)
> #define is_dent_dnode(node_blk) is_node(node_blk, DENT_BIT_SHIFT)
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-08 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-31 10:52 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs-tools: detect and fix NAT entry inconsistencies with dent_flag set liujinbao1
2026-01-08 1:32 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2026-01-12 3:15 ` liujinbao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b79827c-a199-4978-bcdc-76af19190606@kernel.org \
--to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jinbaoliu365@gmail.com \
--cc=liujinbao1@xiaomi.com \
--cc=shengyong1@xiaomi.com \
--cc=yangyongpeng@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).