From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix comment of f2fs_evict_inode
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:04:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f1a7400-04d3-ff1e-3ea0-cf5b95af972c@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190925134706.GA157912@architecture4>
On 2019/9/25 21:47, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Chao,
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 05:30:50PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> evict() should be called once i_count is zero, rather than i_nlinke
>> is zero.
>>
>> Reported-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> fs/f2fs/inode.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
>> index db4fec30c30d..8262f4a483d3 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
>> @@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ int f2fs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> - * Called at the last iput() if i_nlink is zero
>> + * Called at the last iput() if i_count is zero
>
> Yeah, I'd suggest taking some time to look at other
> inconsistent comments, it makes other folks confused
> and ask me with such-"strong" reason...
Xiang, I'm looking into it, will fix those inconsistent comments in another
patch, please wait a while. ;)
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
>
>> */
>> void f2fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
>> {
>> --
>> 2.18.0.rc1
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> .
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-26 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-25 9:30 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix comment of f2fs_evict_inode Chao Yu
2019-09-25 13:47 ` Gao Xiang
2019-09-26 1:04 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2019-09-27 18:31 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-09-27 19:01 ` Gao Xiang via Linux-f2fs-devel
2019-09-29 0:53 ` Chao Yu
2019-09-29 2:20 ` Gao Xiang
2019-09-29 2:52 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f1a7400-04d3-ff1e-3ea0-cf5b95af972c@huawei.com \
--to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
--cc=gaoxiang25@huawei.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).