From: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: fix missing kmem_cache_free
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:34:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <548127D9.4030007@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417740583-1681-1-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 12/05/2014 08:49 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This patch fixes missing kmem_cache_free when handling errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index b1466cf..c59341d 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ retry:
> head->entry_cnt = 0;
>
> if (radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->nat_set_root, set, head)) {
> - cond_resched();
> + kmem_cache_free(nat_entry_set_slab, head);
Why not reuse the allocated entry?
This routine is under nat_tree_lock, so the free_old->research->alloc_new
is needless, because no other ones can race with us.
> goto retry;
And radix_tree_insert can only fail -ENOMEM here, IMO, the in-time retry step
makes very little sense here. How about retaining the "cond_resched()" and retry
insert later?
If I misread something, please correct me.:)
Thanks,
Gu
> }
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-05 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-05 0:49 [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: fix missing kmem_cache_free Jaegeuk Kim
2014-12-05 0:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] f2fs: use rw_semaphore for nat entry lock Jaegeuk Kim
2014-12-05 0:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: call radix_tree_preload before radix_tree_insert Jaegeuk Kim
2014-12-05 3:34 ` Gu Zheng [this message]
2014-12-05 18:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: fix missing kmem_cache_free Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=548127D9.4030007@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).