linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: He YunLei <heyunlei@huawei.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: speed up shrinking extent tree entries
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 20:34:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56794358.8030801@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00bd01d13c78$8a2afc30$9e80f490$@samsung.com>

On 2015/12/22 13:20, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> We should update &total_zombie_tree whenever removing unreferenced
> extent tree during shrinking:
> - f2fs_shrink_extent_tree
> if (!atomic_read(&et->refcount)) {
> 	...
> 	atomic_dec(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
> 	atomic_dec(&sbi->total_zombie_tree);
> 	...
> }
>
> Other parts look good to me. :)
>
> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
>
> Thanks,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 11:39 AM
>> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
>> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
>> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: speed up shrinking extent tree entries
>>
>> If there is no candidates for shrinking slab entries, we don't need to traverse
>> any trees at all.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>   fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>   fs/f2fs/f2fs.h         |  1 +
>>   fs/f2fs/shrinker.c     |  2 +-
>>   3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
>> index 0e97d6af..32693af 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
>> @@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ static struct extent_tree *__grab_extent_tree(struct inode *inode)
>>   		atomic_set(&et->refcount, 0);
>>   		et->count = 0;
>>   		atomic_inc(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
>> +	} else {
>> +		atomic_dec(&sbi->total_zombie_tree);
>>   	}
>>   	atomic_inc(&et->refcount);
>>   	up_write(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
>> @@ -547,10 +549,14 @@ unsigned int f2fs_shrink_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int
>> nr_shrink)
>>   	unsigned int found;
>>   	unsigned int node_cnt = 0, tree_cnt = 0;
>>   	int remained;
>> +	bool do_free = false;
>>
>>   	if (!test_opt(sbi, EXTENT_CACHE))
>>   		return 0;
>>
>> +	if (!atomic_read(&sbi->total_zombie_tree))
>> +		goto free_node;
>> +
>>   	if (!down_write_trylock(&sbi->extent_tree_lock))
>>   		goto out;
>>
>> @@ -580,6 +586,7 @@ unsigned int f2fs_shrink_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int
>> nr_shrink)
>>   	}
>>   	up_write(&sbi->extent_tree_lock);
>>
>> +free_node:
>>   	/* 2. remove LRU extent entries */
>>   	if (!down_write_trylock(&sbi->extent_tree_lock))
>>   		goto out;
>> @@ -591,9 +598,13 @@ unsigned int f2fs_shrink_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int
>> nr_shrink)
>>   		if (!remained--)
>>   			break;
>>   		list_del_init(&en->list);
>> +		do_free = true;
>>   	}
>>   	spin_unlock(&sbi->extent_lock);
>>
>> +	if (do_free == false)
>> +		goto unlock_out;
>> +
>>   	/*
>>   	 * reset ino for searching victims from beginning of global extent tree.
>>   	 */
>> @@ -651,6 +662,7 @@ void f2fs_destroy_extent_tree(struct inode *inode)
>>
>>   	if (inode->i_nlink && !is_bad_inode(inode) && et->count) {
>>   		atomic_dec(&et->refcount);
>> +		atomic_dec(&sbi->total_zombie_tree);
>>   		return;
>>   	}
Hi,all
	here, sbi->total_ext_tree-- also should change to
	atomic_dec(&sbi->total_ext_tree);
Thanks,

>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> index a7f6191..90fb970 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> @@ -763,6 +763,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
>>   	struct list_head extent_list;		/* lru list for shrinker */
>>   	spinlock_t extent_lock;			/* locking extent lru list */
>>   	atomic_t total_ext_tree;		/* extent tree count */
>> +	atomic_t total_zombie_tree;		/* extent zombie tree count */
>>   	atomic_t total_ext_node;		/* extent info count */
>>
>>   	/* basic filesystem units */
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c b/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
>> index a11e099..93606f2 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/shrinker.c
>> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static unsigned long __count_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>
>>   static unsigned long __count_extent_cache(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>   {
>> -	return atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_tree) +
>> +	return atomic_read(&sbi->total_zombie_tree) +
>>   				atomic_read(&sbi->total_ext_node);
>>   }
>>
>> --
>> 2.5.4 (Apple Git-61)
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>
> .
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-22 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-22  3:38 [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: use atomic variable for total_extent_tree Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-22  3:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: speed up shrinking extent tree entries Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-22  3:45   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-22  5:20   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2015-12-22  7:36     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-22 12:34     ` He YunLei [this message]
2015-12-23  9:52       ` Chao Yu
2015-12-22  5:28 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: use atomic variable for total_extent_tree Chao Yu
2015-12-22  7:34   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-22  8:08     ` Chao Yu
2015-12-29 11:11 ` He YunLei
2015-12-30  6:44   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56794358.8030801@huawei.com \
    --to=heyunlei@huawei.com \
    --cc=chao2.yu@samsung.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).