From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: avoid unneeded preflush during checkpoint()
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 09:35:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59da7f3e-92bd-1165-00e3-3dc18ae19aea@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YgFvqnoa61BspqmW@google.com>
On 2022/2/8 3:14, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 02/07, Chao Yu wrote:
>> During checkpoint, we have committed preflush command via f2fs_flush_device_cache()
>
> 787 int f2fs_flush_device_cache(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> 788 {
> 789 int ret = 0, i;
> 790
> 791 if (!f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi))
> 792 return 0;
>
> Seems a wrong assumption.
Oh, I missed that f2fs_flush_device_cache was introduced to flush devices except
first device when multi-device feature is on.
for (i = 1; i < sbi->s_ndevs; i++) {
int count = DEFAULT_RETRY_IO_COUNT;
So, this patch seems wrong...
Instead, below case looks wrong since it needs to trigger flush during checkpoint()
no matter nobarrier is on or off.
if (test_opt(sbi, NOBARRIER))
return 0;
Thanks,
>
>> to persist all metadata pages except last #2 CP pack page, so we don't need to
>> commit another preflush command in commit_checkpoint(), remove it to avoid unneeded
>> write cache overhead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>> index 8c417864c66a..15ac18bbbc8e 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>> @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ static void __f2fs_submit_merged_write(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> io->fio.op = REQ_OP_WRITE;
>> io->fio.op_flags = REQ_META | REQ_PRIO | REQ_SYNC;
>> if (!test_opt(sbi, NOBARRIER))
>> - io->fio.op_flags |= REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FUA;
>> + io->fio.op_flags |= REQ_FUA;
>> }
>> __submit_merged_bio(io);
>> up_write(&io->io_rwsem);
>> --
>> 2.32.0
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-08 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-07 11:35 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: avoid unneeded preflush during checkpoint() Chao Yu
2022-02-07 19:14 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-02-08 1:35 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2022-02-08 9:18 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59da7f3e-92bd-1165-00e3-3dc18ae19aea@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).