From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: introduce nid cache
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 23:25:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c8999e9-f405-7e23-0d1a-209b24f040d8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <452624a9-8b9a-843c-98df-00187a8f795a@huawei.com>
On 2017/2/7 15:24, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> Happy Chinese New Year! :)
>
> On 2017/1/24 12:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> Hi Chao,
>>
>> On 01/22, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> In scenario of intensively node allocation, free nids will be ran out
>>> soon, then it needs to stop to load free nids by traversing NAT blocks,
>>> in worse case, if NAT blocks does not be cached in memory, it generates
>>> IOs which slows down our foreground operations.
>>>
>>> In order to speed up node allocation, in this patch we introduce a new
>>> option named "nid cache", when turns on this option, it will load all
>>> nat entries in NAT blocks when doing mount, and organize all free nids
>>> in a bitmap, for any operations related to free nid, we will query and
>>> set the new prebuilded bitmap instead of reading and lookuping NAT
>>> blocks, so performance of node allocation can be improved.
>>>
>>
>> How does this affect mount time and memory consumption?
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> Let me figure out some numbers later.
a. mount time
I choose slow device (Kingston 16GB SD card) to see how this option affect mount
time when there is not enough bandwidth in low level,
Before the test, I change readahead window size of NAT pages from FREE_NID_PAGES
* 8 to sbi->blocks_per_seg for better ra performance, so the result is:
time mount -t f2fs -o nid_cache /dev/sde /mnt/f2fs/
before:
real 0m0.204s
user 0m0.004s
sys 0m0.020s
after:
real 0m3.792s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.140s
b. memory consumption
For 16GB size image, there is total 34 NAT pages, so memory footprint is:
34 / 2 * 512 * 455 / 8 = 495040 bytes = 483.4 KB
Increasing of memory footprint is liner with total user valid blocks in image,
and at most it will eat 3900 * 8 * 455 / 8 = 1774500 bytes = 1732.9 KB
Thanks,
>
>> IMO, if those do not
>> raise huge concerns, we would be able to consider just replacing current free
>> nid list with this bitmap.
>
> Yup, I agree with you.
>
> Thanks,
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-08 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-22 9:53 [PATCH] f2fs: introduce nid cache Chao Yu
2017-01-24 4:35 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-07 7:24 ` Chao Yu
2017-02-08 15:25 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2017-02-09 1:28 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-11 6:17 ` Chao Yu
2017-02-14 0:25 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-15 2:25 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c8999e9-f405-7e23-0d1a-209b24f040d8@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).