From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17F3FC7618E for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:22:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1pr1lz-0005G2-Ir; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:22:51 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1pr1ly-0005Fq-D1 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:22:50 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nrJOvD5ki07BgC1+m6zA5u3PXXHEIqqCNZygV4WG4uU=; b=UJCs4GZGK61Pm2dQn3HipabvSz ZW36UKIL8LVET8W9xwfb/hxJVrteHZ4QIkITcTUkwDuNG+H3savq9IY/Du/EtHjbsjN9UzcFjWwDe QKKk8IrRlGhr1aLx0z/vsnrmFg3xlVRQ94RJwcKdrkKSKKcV/2Y2xehafoLWVWN+6Ups=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nrJOvD5ki07BgC1+m6zA5u3PXXHEIqqCNZygV4WG4uU=; b=JjKI7RiopUOKyOfO5DoxbUKIKF gblYWFPMK9x6xmuhmFlw6O0SpLuabFE1dDmDsRBlHIKjNAj6Jp7LDwteDBCbnvcoIlWnvThujLDRg 7qk4UZO9sVK8JQH2PA9SbF43lNrvRRIQeZjOu5Qn7nsiXtYNTvXdH7qcewdRd2u5woRc=; Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.95) id 1pr1lv-00007M-2x for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:22:50 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=nrJOvD5ki07BgC1+m6zA5u3PXXHEIqqCNZygV4WG4uU=; b=jnaw2GVRUGJ3XgLDcnTm28/EGW I2c3SbIfk7aZCwr+R62bxYgluHATBsXpKHRc3Kd6eZ7X7q4C2PFIRnKN2s2rlLjl0PYv4/SHsIN/P Rj2zV9EqLlkLs/pB1Tdm+dvzQqZ3dxlb0SloO08wS4cUh9bmguHSZK/++Sq79+k4zzVbiIuZ6QX0S G/8MCyWL3hZerN11vkKzieKj7slIpAxQGdYJVp+7U764B2QvlYl7+o1DeyOxzKUG+7D0WMFdPQDdQ HSq8SrEJKQQidA3dpPqgpftvseREm3IU//74IrRNpeEcmqw1SOz1YOqefNqU0PC23jpEwwctyAAtq 26XseFOA==; Received: from [2601:1c2:980:9ec0::2764] by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pr1lf-00H3HP-0y; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:22:31 +0000 Message-ID: <5f30b56e-b46b-1d3f-75fb-7f30ff6ca3e9@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 12:22:30 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe References: <20230424054926.26927-1-hch@lst.de> <20230424054926.26927-3-hch@lst.de> From: Randy Dunlap In-Reply-To: <20230424054926.26927-3-hch@lst.de> X-Headers-End: 1pr1lv-00007M-2x Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 02/17] fs: remove the special !CONFIG_BLOCK def_blk_fops X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi , "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, David Howells , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Hi, On 4/23/23 22:49, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > def_blk_fops always returns -ENODEV, which dosn't match the return value > of a non-existing block device with CONFIG_BLOCK, which is -ENXIO. > Just remove the extra implementation and fall back to the default > no_open_fops that always returns -ENXIO. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > --- > fs/Makefile | 10 ++-------- > fs/inode.c | 3 ++- > fs/no-block.c | 19 ------------------- > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 fs/no-block.c > > diff --git a/fs/Makefile b/fs/Makefile > index 05f89b5c962f88..da21e7d0a1cf37 100644 > --- a/fs/Makefile > +++ b/fs/Makefile > @@ -18,14 +18,8 @@ obj-y := open.o read_write.o file_table.o super.o \ > fs_types.o fs_context.o fs_parser.o fsopen.o init.o \ > kernel_read_file.o mnt_idmapping.o remap_range.o > > -ifeq ($(CONFIG_BLOCK),y) > -obj-y += buffer.o mpage.o > -else > -obj-y += no-block.o > -endif > - > -obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += proc_namespace.o > - > +obj-$(CONFIG_BLOCK) += buffer.o mpage.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += proc_namespace.o > obj-$(CONFIG_LEGACY_DIRECT_IO) += direct-io.o > obj-y += notify/ > obj-$(CONFIG_EPOLL) += eventpoll.o > diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c > index 4558dc2f135573..d43f07f146eb73 100644 > --- a/fs/inode.c > +++ b/fs/inode.c > @@ -2265,7 +2265,8 @@ void init_special_inode(struct inode *inode, umode_t mode, dev_t rdev) > inode->i_fop = &def_chr_fops; > inode->i_rdev = rdev; > } else if (S_ISBLK(mode)) { > - inode->i_fop = &def_blk_fops; > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLOCK)) > + inode->i_fop = &def_blk_fops; It looks like def_blk_fops is being removed (commit message and patch fragment below), but here (above line) it is being used. Am I just confused? > inode->i_rdev = rdev; > } else if (S_ISFIFO(mode)) > inode->i_fop = &pipefifo_fops; > diff --git a/fs/no-block.c b/fs/no-block.c > deleted file mode 100644 > index 481c0f0ab4bd2c..00000000000000 > --- a/fs/no-block.c > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ > -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > -/* no-block.c: implementation of routines required for non-BLOCK configuration > - * > - * Copyright (C) 2006 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > - * Written by David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com) > - */ > - > -#include > -#include > - > -static int no_blkdev_open(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp) > -{ > - return -ENODEV; > -} > - > -const struct file_operations def_blk_fops = { > - .open = no_blkdev_open, > - .llseek = noop_llseek, > -}; -- ~Randy _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel