From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: avoid false alarm of circular locking
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 08:42:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <608462ac-5a26-bc14-4a74-ed133eb5cdca@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230819003012.3473675-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
On 2023/8/19 8:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 6.5.0-rc5-syzkaller-00353-gae545c3283dc #0 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz-executor273/5027 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline]
> ffff888077fe1fb0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline]
> ffff888077fe07c8 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_add_dentry+0x92/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:783
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 (&fi->i_xattr_sem){.+.+}-{3:3}:
> down_read+0x9c/0x470 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520
> f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2108 [inline]
> f2fs_getxattr+0xb1e/0x12c0 fs/f2fs/xattr.c:532
> __f2fs_get_acl+0x5a/0x900 fs/f2fs/acl.c:179
> f2fs_acl_create fs/f2fs/acl.c:377 [inline]
> f2fs_init_acl+0x15c/0xb30 fs/f2fs/acl.c:420
> f2fs_init_inode_metadata+0x159/0x1290 fs/f2fs/dir.c:558
> f2fs_add_regular_entry+0x79e/0xb90 fs/f2fs/dir.c:740
> f2fs_add_dentry+0x1de/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:788
> f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827
> f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline]
> f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781
> vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117
> do_mkdirat+0x2a9/0x330 fs/namei.c:4140
> __do_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4160 [inline]
> __se_sys_mkdir fs/namei.c:4158 [inline]
> __x64_sys_mkdir+0xf2/0x140 fs/namei.c:4158
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> -> #0 (&fi->i_sem){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
> lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline]
> lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726
> down_write+0x93/0x200 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573
> f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2133 [inline]
> f2fs_add_inline_entry+0x300/0x6f0 fs/f2fs/inline.c:644
> f2fs_add_dentry+0xa6/0x230 fs/f2fs/dir.c:784
> f2fs_do_add_link+0x190/0x280 fs/f2fs/dir.c:827
> f2fs_add_link fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3554 [inline]
> f2fs_mkdir+0x377/0x620 fs/f2fs/namei.c:781
> vfs_mkdir+0x532/0x7e0 fs/namei.c:4117
> ovl_do_mkdir fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:196 [inline]
> ovl_mkdir_real+0xb5/0x370 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:146
> ovl_workdir_create+0x3de/0x820 fs/overlayfs/super.c:309
> ovl_make_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:711 [inline]
> ovl_get_workdir fs/overlayfs/super.c:864 [inline]
> ovl_fill_super+0xdab/0x6180 fs/overlayfs/super.c:1400
> vfs_get_super+0xf9/0x290 fs/super.c:1152
> vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x350 fs/super.c:1519
> do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3335 [inline]
> path_mount+0x1492/0x1ed0 fs/namespace.c:3662
> do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline]
> __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline]
> __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3861 [inline]
> __x64_sys_mount+0x293/0x310 fs/namespace.c:3861
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> rlock(&fi->i_xattr_sem);
> lock(&fi->i_sem);
> lock(&fi->i_xattr_sem);
> lock(&fi->i_sem);
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 5eda1ad1aaff "f2fs: fix deadlock in i_xattr_sem and inode page lock"
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-21 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-19 0:30 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: avoid false alarm of circular locking Jaegeuk Kim
2023-08-19 2:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-08-21 0:42 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2023-08-21 19:50 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=608462ac-5a26-bc14-4a74-ed133eb5cdca@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+e5600587fa9cbf8e3826@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).