linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: don't reopen the main block device in f2fs_scan_devices
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 08:19:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <63766a54-54db-20a7-ba2f-d31fd230623d@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230711050101.GA19128@lst.de>

On 7/11/23 07:01, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I think that's because it doesn't look at sbi->s_ndevs in
> destroy_device_list.  Let's try the variant below, which also fixes
> the buildbot warning for non-zoned configfs:
> 
> ---
>  From 645d8dceaa97b6ee73be067495b111b15b187498 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 10:31:49 +0200
> Subject: f2fs: don't reopen the main block device in f2fs_scan_devices
> 
> f2fs_scan_devices reopens the main device since the very beginning, which
> has always been useless, and also means that we don't pass the right
> holder for the reopen, which now leads to a warning as the core super.c
> holder ops aren't passed in for the reopen.
> 
> Fixes: 3c62be17d4f5 ("f2fs: support multiple devices")
> Fixes: 0718afd47f70 ("block: introduce holder ops")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>   block/blk-flush.c |  2 +-
>   fs/f2fs/super.c   | 20 ++++++++------------
>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index ca31163da00a55..30883beb750a59 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -1561,7 +1561,8 @@ static void destroy_device_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>   	int i;
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < sbi->s_ndevs; i++) {
> -		blkdev_put(FDEV(i).bdev, sbi->sb->s_type);
> +		if (i > 0)
> +			blkdev_put(FDEV(i).bdev, sbi->sb->s_type);
You could have started the loop at '1', and avoid the curious 'if' 
clause ...

>   #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
>   		kvfree(FDEV(i).blkz_seq);
>   #endif
> @@ -4190,16 +4191,12 @@ static int f2fs_scan_devices(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>   	sbi->aligned_blksize = true;
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < max_devices; i++) {
> -
> -		if (i > 0 && !RDEV(i).path[0])
> +		if (i == 0)
> +			FDEV(0).bdev = sbi->sb->s_bdev;
> +		else if (!RDEV(i).path[0])
>   			break;
>   
> -		if (max_devices == 1) {
> -			/* Single zoned block device mount */
> -			FDEV(0).bdev =
> -				blkdev_get_by_dev(sbi->sb->s_bdev->bd_dev, mode,
> -						  sbi->sb->s_type, NULL);
> -		} else {
> +		if (max_devices > 1) {
>   			/* Multi-device mount */
>   			memcpy(FDEV(i).path, RDEV(i).path, MAX_PATH_LEN);
>   			FDEV(i).total_segments =
Similar here; wouldn't it be better to unroll the loop, and have the 
check for 'max_devices' outside of the loop?
Then the loop can be coded for the 'max_device > 1' case only, and avoid 
all the special casing in the loop ...

> @@ -4215,10 +4212,9 @@ static int f2fs_scan_devices(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>   				FDEV(i).end_blk = FDEV(i).start_blk +
>   					(FDEV(i).total_segments <<
>   					sbi->log_blocks_per_seg) - 1;
> +				FDEV(i).bdev = blkdev_get_by_path(FDEV(i).path,
> +					mode, sbi->sb->s_type, NULL);
>   			}
> -			FDEV(i).bdev = blkdev_get_by_path(FDEV(i).path, mode,
> -							  sbi->sb->s_type,
> -							  NULL);
>   		}
>   		if (IS_ERR(FDEV(i).bdev))
>   			return PTR_ERR(FDEV(i).bdev);

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew
Myers, Andrew McDonald, Martje Boudien Moerman



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-11  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-07  9:40 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: don't reopen the main block device in f2fs_scan_devices Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-10 21:22 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2023-07-10 23:51   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-07-11  1:52     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2023-07-11  2:00       ` Damien Le Moal
2023-07-11  5:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-11  6:19     ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2023-07-11  6:22       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-11 16:17     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2023-07-17 15:16     ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=63766a54-54db-20a7-ba2f-d31fd230623d@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).