From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>, guo weichao <guoweichao@msn.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] 回复: [PATCH] fsck.f2fs: write checkpoint with OPU mode
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:36:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <637ce454-0ca9-77db-fb63-1577762ddc79@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <efdf67e2-74d4-bc6d-2ad3-f9b2d308fcff@huawei.com>
Hi all,
One more concern is that, if checkpoint A is corrupted, and checkpoint B is
valid, we may copy CP B to CP A, and then writeback fixed CP B with the same
cp_ver, then kernel will load CP A if two CP has the same cp_ver, result in
loading wrong CP, right?
Thanks,
On 2019-6-24 10:24, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> I picked up Weichao's patch since I'm not sure whether Weichao still has time
> working on it.
>
> On 2019/6/24 9:23, guo weichao wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> I think it's better to copy CP A to CP B position first, which can make sure we
>> have a fsck-not-touched correct checkpoint.
>
> Jaegeuk, Weichao,
>
> I think it's okay, let me update the patch. :)
>
>>
>> P.S: did you want to discuss it with Chao Yu? :)HAHA
>
> Weichao, it's glad to see your activity again. ;)
>
> Thanks,
>
>>
>> BR,
>> Weichao
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *发件人:* Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
>> *发送时间:* 2019年6月23日 5:46
>> *收件人:* Chao Yu
>> *抄送:* linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> *主题:* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] fsck.f2fs: write checkpoint with OPU mode
>>
>> Hi Weichao,
>>
>> This patch breaks the image found by my local power-cut tests.
>>
>> On 05/24, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> This original patch was from Weichao Guo.
>>>
>>> We may encounter both checkpoints invalid in such a case:
>>> 1. kernel writes CP A;
>>> 2. power-cut when kernel writes CP B, then CP B is corrupted;
>>> 3. fsck: load CP A, fix meta/data;
>>
>> Would it be better to copy CP A to CP B position first?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>> 4. power-cut when fsck writes CP A in-place, then CP A is corrupted too;
>>>
>>> To avoid both checkpoints being invalid, this patch changes to enables
>>> fsck to write checkpoint with out-place-update method first, and then
>>> write checkpoint in original place.
>>>
>>> This can make sure during fsck repairing, even there is sudden power-cut,
>>> filesystem will still have at least one valid checkpoint.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Weichao Guo <guoweichao@huawei.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>> - clean up codes
>>> - cover flush_journal_entries() case
>>> - update commet message
>>> fsck/fsck.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>>> fsck/fsck.h | 1 +
>>> fsck/mount.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fsck/fsck.c b/fsck/fsck.c
>>> index 6f0f262..6aed51d 100644
>>> --- a/fsck/fsck.c
>>> +++ b/fsck/fsck.c
>>> @@ -2121,6 +2121,19 @@ static void fix_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>> write_nat_bits(sbi, sb, cp, sbi->cur_cp);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void fix_checkpoints(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>> +{
>>> + int i, ret;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>>> + /* write checkpoint out of place first */
>>> + sbi->cur_cp = sbi->cur_cp % 2 + 1;
>>> + fix_checkpoint(sbi);
>>> + ret = f2fs_fsync_device();
>>> + ASSERT(ret >= 0);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> int check_curseg_offset(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
>>> {
>>> struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, type);
>>> @@ -2771,10 +2784,10 @@ int fsck_verify(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>> rewrite_sit_area_bitmap(sbi);
>>> fix_curseg_info(sbi);
>>> fix_checksum(sbi);
>>> - fix_checkpoint(sbi);
>>> + fix_checkpoints(sbi);
>>> } else if (is_set_ckpt_flags(cp, CP_FSCK_FLAG) ||
>>> is_set_ckpt_flags(cp, CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG)) {
>>> - write_checkpoint(sbi);
>>> + write_checkpoints(sbi);
>>> }
>>> }
>>> return ret;
>>> diff --git a/fsck/fsck.h b/fsck/fsck.h
>>> index d38e8de..8fe5db1 100644
>>> --- a/fsck/fsck.h
>>> +++ b/fsck/fsck.h
>>> @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ extern void move_curseg_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *, u64, int);
>>> extern void write_curseg_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
>>> extern int find_next_free_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *, u64 *, int, int);
>>> extern void write_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
>>> +extern void write_checkpoints(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
>>> extern void update_superblock(struct f2fs_super_block *, int);
>>> extern void update_data_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *, nid_t, u16, block_t);
>>> extern void update_nat_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *, nid_t, nid_t, block_t);
>>> diff --git a/fsck/mount.c b/fsck/mount.c
>>> index 1c5cd93..bbb1af7 100644
>>> --- a/fsck/mount.c
>>> +++ b/fsck/mount.c
>>> @@ -2127,7 +2127,7 @@ void flush_journal_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>> int n_sits = flush_sit_journal_entries(sbi);
>>>
>>> if (n_nats || n_sits)
>>> - write_checkpoint(sbi);
>>> + write_checkpoints(sbi);
>>> }
>>>
>>> void flush_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>> @@ -2452,6 +2452,19 @@ void write_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>> ASSERT(ret >= 0);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +void write_checkpoints(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>> +{
>>> + int i, ret;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>>> + /* write checkpoint out of place first */
>>> + sbi->cur_cp = sbi->cur_cp % 2 + 1;
>>> + write_checkpoint(sbi);
>>> + ret = f2fs_fsync_device();
>>> + ASSERT(ret >= 0);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> void build_nat_area_bitmap(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>> {
>>> struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_HOT_DATA);
>>> --
>>> 2.18.0.rc1
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-24 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-24 7:56 [PATCH] fsck.f2fs: write checkpoint with OPU mode Chao Yu
2019-06-22 21:46 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
[not found] ` <MWHPR02MB26710762B08C9EAB74BB2FABC6E00@MWHPR02MB2671.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
2019-06-24 2:24 ` [f2fs-dev] 回复: " Chao Yu
2019-06-24 14:36 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2019-06-24 16:02 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2019-06-25 1:59 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=637ce454-0ca9-77db-fb63-1577762ddc79@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=guoweichao@msn.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).