linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Ming Yan <yanming@tju.edu.cn>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix deadloop in foreground GC
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 08:39:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c0e4596-1698-25d5-7b59-c0ee6ef7eefd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YnGrvEjxgaXDnxxi@google.com>

On 2022/5/4 6:25, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/30, Chao Yu wrote:
>> As Yanming reported in bugzilla:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215914
>>
>> The root cause is: in a very small sized image, it's very easy to
>> exceed threshold of foreground GC, if we calculate free space and
>> dirty data based on section granularity, in corner case,
>> has_not_enough_free_secs() will always return true, result in
>> deadloop in f2fs_gc().
> 
> Performance regression was reported. Can we check this for very small sized
> image only?

I noticed that, I've fixed the issue in v2, could you please take a look?

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> So this patch refactors has_not_enough_free_secs() as below to fix
>> this issue:
>> 1. calculate needed space based on block granularity, and separate
>> all blocks to two parts, section part, and block part, comparing
>> section part to free section, and comparing block part to free space
>> in openned log.
>> 2. account F2FS_DIRTY_NODES, F2FS_DIRTY_IMETA and F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS
>> as node block consumer;
>> 3. account F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS as data block consumer;
>>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Reported-by: Ming Yan <yanming@tju.edu.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao.yu@oppo.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/f2fs/segment.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
>>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
>> index 8a591455d796..28f7aa9b40bf 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
>> @@ -575,11 +575,10 @@ static inline int reserved_sections(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>   	return GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, reserved_segments(sbi));
>>   }
>>   
>> -static inline bool has_curseg_enough_space(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>> +static inline bool has_curseg_enough_space(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> +			unsigned int node_blocks, unsigned int dent_blocks)
>>   {
>> -	unsigned int node_blocks = get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES) +
>> -					get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS);
>> -	unsigned int dent_blocks = get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS);
>> +
>>   	unsigned int segno, left_blocks;
>>   	int i;
>>   
>> @@ -605,19 +604,24 @@ static inline bool has_curseg_enough_space(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>   static inline bool has_not_enough_free_secs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>   					int freed, int needed)
>>   {
>> -	int node_secs = get_blocktype_secs(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
>> -	int dent_secs = get_blocktype_secs(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS);
>> -	int imeta_secs = get_blocktype_secs(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_IMETA);
>> +	unsigned int total_node_blocks = get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES) +
>> +					get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS) +
>> +					get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_IMETA);
>> +	unsigned int total_dent_blocks = get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS);
>> +	unsigned int node_secs = total_node_blocks / BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi);
>> +	unsigned int dent_secs = total_dent_blocks / BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi);
>> +	unsigned int node_blocks = total_node_blocks % BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi);
>> +	unsigned int dent_blocks = total_dent_blocks % BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi);
>>   
>>   	if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
>>   		return false;
>>   
>> -	if (free_sections(sbi) + freed == reserved_sections(sbi) + needed &&
>> -			has_curseg_enough_space(sbi))
>> -		return false;
>> -	return (free_sections(sbi) + freed) <=
>> -		(node_secs + 2 * dent_secs + imeta_secs +
>> -		reserved_sections(sbi) + needed);
>> +	if (free_sections(sbi) + freed <=
>> +			node_secs + dent_secs + reserved_sections(sbi) + needed)
>> +		return true;
>> +	if (!has_curseg_enough_space(sbi, node_blocks, dent_blocks))
>> +		return true;
>> +	return false;
>>   }
>>   
>>   static inline bool f2fs_is_checkpoint_ready(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>> -- 
>> 2.32.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2022-05-04  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-29 20:46 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix deadloop in foreground GC Chao Yu
2022-05-03 22:25 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-05-04  0:39   ` Chao Yu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6c0e4596-1698-25d5-7b59-c0ee6ef7eefd@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yanming@tju.edu.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).