linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Sheng Yong <shengyong1@huawei.com>,
	jaegeuk@kernel.org, yuchao0@huawei.com
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] f2fs: do not set LOST_PINO for created/renamed dir
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 23:12:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c8726e9-add3-fca8-902c-4624c6180d30@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170622064726.35016-1-shengyong1@huawei.com>

Hi Sheng Yong,

On 2017/6/22 14:47, Sheng Yong wrote:
> Since directories will be written back with checkpoint and fsync a
> directory will always write CP, there is no need to set LOST_PINO

Could you make another patch to fix unneeded flag setting in directory?

Thanks,

> after creating or renaming a directory. During rename, fix dir's
> p_ino directly. Otherwise, fsck will find out that the pino does
> not match. The scenario can be reproduced as the following:
> 
> 	$ mkdir /bar/subbar /foo
> 	$ rename /bar/subbar /foo
> 
> Then fsck will report:
> [ASSERT] (__chk_dots_dentries:1182)  --> Bad inode number[0x3] for '..', parent parent ino is [0x4]>
> Signed-off-by: Sheng Yong <shengyong1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/dir.c   | 3 ++-
>  fs/f2fs/namei.c | 5 ++++-
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/dir.c b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
> index 94756f55a97e..37f9c7f55605 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/dir.c
> @@ -415,7 +415,8 @@ struct page *init_inode_metadata(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
>  	 * We lost i_pino from now on.
>  	 */
>  	if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_INC_LINK)) {
> -		file_lost_pino(inode);
> +		if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
> +			file_lost_pino(inode);
>  		/*
>  		 * If link the tmpfile to alias through linkat path,
>  		 * we should remove this inode from orphan list.
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> index c31b40e5f9cf..b75dc2f4ad57 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> @@ -772,7 +772,10 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
>  	}
>  
>  	down_write(&F2FS_I(old_inode)->i_sem);
> -	file_lost_pino(old_inode);
> +	if (!old_dir_entry || whiteout)
> +		file_lost_pino(old_inode);
> +	else
> +		F2FS_I(old_inode)->i_pino = new_dir->i_ino;
>  	up_write(&F2FS_I(old_inode)->i_sem);
>  
>  	old_inode->i_ctime = current_time(old_inode);
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

      reply	other threads:[~2017-06-24 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-22  6:47 [RFC PATCH] f2fs: do not set LOST_PINO for created/renamed dir Sheng Yong
2017-06-24 15:12 ` Chao Yu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6c8726e9-add3-fca8-902c-4624c6180d30@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=shengyong1@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).