From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Chunhai Guo <guochunhai@vivo.com>
Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, frank.li@vivo.com,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4] fsck.f2fs: Detect and fix looped node chain efficiently
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 17:16:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <728da437-f15a-a4ca-039b-2cdd09e9955a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <185a5563-8bc9-2fb2-163e-2d14b9459ae4@kernel.org>
On 2023/5/18 17:10, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2023/5/18 12:11, Chunhai Guo wrote:
>> find_fsync_inode() detect the looped node chain by comparing the loop
>> counter with free blocks. While it may take tens of seconds to quit when
>> the free blocks are large enough. We can use Floyd's cycle detection
>> algorithm to make the detection more efficient, and fix the issue by
>> filling a NULL address in the last node of the chain.
>>
>> Below is the log we encounter on a 256GB UFS storage and it takes about
>> 25 seconds to detect looped node chain. After changing the algorithm, it
>> takes about 20ms to finish the same job.
>>
>> [ 10.822904] fsck.f2fs: Info: version timestamp cur: 17, prev: 430
>> [ 10.822949] fsck.f2fs: [update_superblock: 762] Info: Done to
>> update superblock
>> [ 10.822953] fsck.f2fs: Info: superblock features = 1499 :
>> encrypt verity extr\x02a_attr project_quota quota_ino casefold
>> [ 10.822956] fsck.f2fs: Info: superblock encrypt level = 0, salt =
>> 00000000000000000000000000000000
>> [ 10.822960] fsck.f2fs: Info: total FS sectors = 59249811 (231444
>> MB)
>> [ 35.852827] fsck.f2fs: detect looped node chain,
>> blkaddr:1114802, next:1114803
>> [ 35.852842] fsck.f2fs: [f2fs_do_mount:3846] record_fsync_data
>> failed
>> [ 35.856106] fsck.f2fs: fsck.f2fs terminated by exit(255)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chunhai Guo <guochunhai@vivo.com>
>> ---
>> fsck/mount.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fsck/mount.c b/fsck/mount.c
>> index df0314d57caf..755b659f0c27 100644
>> --- a/fsck/mount.c
>> +++ b/fsck/mount.c
>> @@ -3394,22 +3394,91 @@ static void destroy_fsync_dnodes(struct list_head *head)
>> del_fsync_inode(entry);
>> }
>> +static int find_node_blk_fast(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t *blkaddr_fast,
>> + struct f2fs_node *node_blk_fast, bool *is_detecting)
>> +{
>> + int i, err;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>> + if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, *blkaddr_fast, META_POR)) {
>> + *is_detecting = false;
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + err = dev_read_block(node_blk_fast, *blkaddr_fast);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + if (!is_recoverable_dnode(sbi, node_blk_fast)) {
>> + *is_detecting = false;
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + *blkaddr_fast = next_blkaddr_of_node(node_blk_fast);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int loop_node_chain_fix(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> + block_t blkaddr_fast, struct f2fs_node *node_blk_fast,
>> + block_t blkaddr, struct f2fs_node *node_blk)
>> +{
>> + block_t blkaddr_entry, blkaddr_tmp;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + /* find the entry point of the looped node chain */
>> + while (blkaddr_fast != blkaddr) {
>> + err = dev_read_block(node_blk_fast, blkaddr_fast);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> + blkaddr_fast = next_blkaddr_of_node(node_blk_fast);
>> +
>> + err = dev_read_block(node_blk, blkaddr);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> + blkaddr = next_blkaddr_of_node(node_blk);
>> + }
>> + blkaddr_entry = blkaddr;
>> +
>> + /* find the last node of the chain */
>> + do {
>> + blkaddr_tmp = blkaddr;
>> + err = dev_read_block(node_blk, blkaddr);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> + blkaddr = next_blkaddr_of_node(node_blk);
>> + } while (blkaddr != blkaddr_entry);
>> +
>> + /* fix the blkaddr of last node with NULL_ADDR. */
>> + node_blk->footer.next_blkaddr = NULL_ADDR;
>> + if (node_blk->footer.nid == node_blk->footer.ino)
>
> if (le32_to_cpu(node_blk->footer.nid) == le32_to_cpu(node_blk->footer.ino))
Oh, we can use IS_INODE() here?
Thanks,
>
> Otherwise, it looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
>
>> + err = write_inode(node_blk, blkaddr_tmp);
>> + else
>> + err = dev_write_block(node_blk, blkaddr_tmp);
>> + if (!err)
>> + FIX_MSG("Fix looped node chain on blkaddr %u\n",
>> + blkaddr_tmp);
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int find_fsync_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *head)
>> {
>> struct curseg_info *curseg;
>> - struct f2fs_node *node_blk;
>> - block_t blkaddr;
>> - unsigned int loop_cnt = 0;
>> - unsigned int free_blocks = MAIN_SEGS(sbi) * sbi->blocks_per_seg -
>> - sbi->total_valid_block_count;
>> + struct f2fs_node *node_blk, *node_blk_fast;
>> + block_t blkaddr, blkaddr_fast;
>> + bool is_detecting = true;
>> int err = 0;
>> + node_blk = calloc(F2FS_BLKSIZE, 1);
>> + node_blk_fast = calloc(F2FS_BLKSIZE, 1);
>> + ASSERT(node_blk && node_blk_fast);
>> +
>> +retry:
>> /* get node pages in the current segment */
>> curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_WARM_NODE);
>> blkaddr = NEXT_FREE_BLKADDR(sbi, curseg);
>> -
>> - node_blk = calloc(F2FS_BLKSIZE, 1);
>> - ASSERT(node_blk);
>> + blkaddr_fast = blkaddr;
>> while (1) {
>> struct fsync_inode_entry *entry;
>> @@ -3440,19 +3509,42 @@ static int find_fsync_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *head)
>> if (IS_INODE(node_blk) && is_dent_dnode(node_blk))
>> entry->last_dentry = blkaddr;
>> next:
>> - /* sanity check in order to detect looped node chain */
>> - if (++loop_cnt >= free_blocks ||
>> - blkaddr == next_blkaddr_of_node(node_blk)) {
>> - MSG(0, "\tdetect looped node chain, blkaddr:%u, next:%u\n",
>> - blkaddr,
>> - next_blkaddr_of_node(node_blk));
>> - err = -1;
>> - break;
>> - }
>> -
>> blkaddr = next_blkaddr_of_node(node_blk);
>> +
>> + /* sanity check to detect looped node chain with Floyd's cycle
>> + * detection algorithm
>> + */
>> + if (is_detecting) {
>> + err = find_node_blk_fast(sbi, &blkaddr_fast,
>> + node_blk_fast, &is_detecting);
>> + if (err)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + if (blkaddr_fast != blkaddr)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + ASSERT_MSG("\tdetect looped node chain, blkaddr:%u\n",
>> + blkaddr);
>> +
>> + if (!c.fix_on) {
>> + err = -1;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + err = loop_node_chain_fix(sbi,
>> + NEXT_FREE_BLKADDR(sbi, curseg),
>> + node_blk_fast, blkaddr, node_blk);
>> + if (err)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + /* After fixing the looped node chain, retry agian. */
>> + is_detecting = false;
>> + destroy_fsync_dnodes(head);
>> + goto retry;
>> + }
>> }
>> + free(node_blk_fast);
>> free(node_blk);
>> return err;
>> }
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-18 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-18 4:11 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4] fsck.f2fs: Detect and fix looped node chain efficiently Chunhai Guo via Linux-f2fs-devel
2023-05-18 9:10 ` Chao Yu
2023-05-18 9:16 ` Chao Yu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=728da437-f15a-a4ca-039b-2cdd09e9955a@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=frank.li@vivo.com \
--cc=guochunhai@vivo.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).