From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chandan Rajendra Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 02/14] Consolidate "post read processing" into a new file Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 20:29:10 +0530 Message-ID: <7402364.ucYHGh3o57@localhost.localdomain> References: <20190424043730.13683-1-chandan@linux.ibm.com> <6353008.fQNhCuxumZ@localhost.localdomain> <20190424142423.GA12761@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hJJM3-0001pF-UG for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:58:35 +0000 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5] helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1hJJM2-00BB1Q-2O for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:58:35 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3OEst8b060438 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:58:23 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2s2qpng2dw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:58:23 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 15:58:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20190424142423.GA12761@infradead.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: tytso@mit.edu, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, ebiggers@kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, April 24, 2019 7:54:23 PM IST Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 03:34:17PM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote: > > To clarify, Are you suggesting that a new kconfig option (say > > CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS) be provided to the user so that the following could > > occur, > > > > 1. User selects CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION and/or CONFIG_FS_VERITY and this causes > > CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS to be set to 'y'. > > 2. User selects CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS explicitly. > > If you don't add a user description to a Kconfig entry it won't be > visible to users, but only selectable by other options. That is what > I suggest. > > Thanks for the clarification. I will make the necessary changes. -- chandan