From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chao Yu Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix quota info to adjust recovered data Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 07:51:10 +0800 Message-ID: <7aa2e6f3-a4b2-dfdd-6205-f19c4bc952e6@kernel.org> References: <20180911201546.56566-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180911201546.56566-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jaegeuk Kim , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net On 2018/9/12 4:15, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > fsck.f2fs is able to recover the quota structure, since roll-forward recovery > can recover it based on previous user information. I didn't get it, both fsck and kernel recover quota file based all inodes' uid/gid/prjid, if {x}id didn't change, wouldn't those two recovery result be the same? Thanks, > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim > --- > fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c > index 95511ed11a22..1fde86a2107e 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c > @@ -675,6 +675,9 @@ int f2fs_recover_fsync_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool check_only) > > need_writecp = true; > > + /* quota is not fully updated due to the lack of user information. */ > + set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK); > + > /* step #2: recover data */ > err = recover_data(sbi, &inode_list, &dir_list); > if (!err) >