From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CD7C64E7A for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:04:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2390820809; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:04:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="ToyKUANh"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="MH0XHnUl" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2390820809 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kk1aB-0003Sw-R4; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 09:04:23 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kk1aA-0003Si-Cl for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 09:04:22 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=SANmq8K1CrivA5RvCxUjxXRUUdd5ZO5p966zibpNwAM=; b=ToyKUANh4eIgzuZq6YKL3XrNja 5BmAFk6iJEXEhatO7ahE6JIRHxwDwAyk9KvdVx2o2KOQvmpmoWxg90esu9h7JSN4d/iUFabCE+/Y/ on7q4BE+pqTIk6m/8FXaoJ/Xpj2OJ1tgphOmvWf9f/gyxtKsb7vj6EVLbYsI7jOWKNHM=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=SANmq8K1CrivA5RvCxUjxXRUUdd5ZO5p966zibpNwAM=; b=MH0XHnUl8Blq/9IoKq2I7wK04v Bxyx1nfhinT1zh1vt2dyCZ47t3EILWaRQK7O+4uOpF5Bvzi725BlL+kTeLDEF0dgYXPYxrm9g5JqB UJy6jn1TGttxNiDw8egddm6W3Sjl6g1hHT5W0wC+LE7GVoJdr2E0WPmx04Tdp15470cs=; Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kk1a0-008nKE-S5 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 09:04:20 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Clbjt0pWgzhlRL; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:03:30 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.136.114.67] (10.136.114.67) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:03:23 +0800 To: Jaegeuk Kim , , References: <20201126022416.3068426-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20201126022416.3068426-3-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20201201040935.GC3858797@google.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <7f10f16c-b406-f21c-fd11-ea0fb7707ea0@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:03:24 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201201040935.GC3858797@google.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.136.114.67] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1kk1a0-008nKE-S5 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/4] f2fs: fix wrong block count instead of bytes X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux F2FS Dev Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2020/12/1 12:09, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 11/25, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >> We should convert cur_lblock, a block count, to bytes for len. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Fixes: af4b6b8edf6a ("f2fs: introduce check_swap_activate_fast()") Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel