From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2626C2D0A8 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 639BC20725 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="UtYtiHpF"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="GkeATj5T" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 639BC20725 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLBPv-0004PY-ST; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:31:07 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLBPu-0004PL-NB for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:31:06 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=RZF+60CHg/BC1ljaATYS2ajzuq3zBkpLEZWbLRHtPIM=; b=UtYtiHpFcvyRyd5B/DxYmQYMX1 Y9tzcKRy1dBFd3ScUwViFVQQq5ngBleSJrBrpvrOzYb27kolL1mivAjkpmd8JZZ2MAdMM5zRKV7rf 6dbOXt4dUJ1COxDEvKPusVEkQVWK5+ZZ9uHBi+NUFsszczSgCLF4z7jkmbjqPsC6I1qY=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject: Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=RZF+60CHg/BC1ljaATYS2ajzuq3zBkpLEZWbLRHtPIM=; b=GkeATj5TWJsnGaizBgIHbTQlSx qmcLqgL7d7dCW8/gd2N+1tlhSHkT3Ng/L4nfHSS/9vRoLuViK0jS266S8fsvQBDQ+VBxI68T5qfeB uUGtlrRdKvBgb50v/aQ+3LaOncoZ4J0dpg5o9zcoAcBVioOPtS3DS/UkTgOMw7xXtJjg=; Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kLBPs-0031bF-FZ for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:31:06 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: krisman) with ESMTPSA id 3695329C66D From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi To: Eric Biggers Organization: Collabora References: <20200923010151.69506-1-drosen@google.com> <20200923010151.69506-2-drosen@google.com> <20200923054714.GB9538@sol.localdomain> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:30:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200923054714.GB9538@sol.localdomain> (Eric Biggers's message of "Tue, 22 Sep 2020 22:47:14 -0700") Message-ID: <87o8lw5j7u.fsf@collabora.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Headers-End: 1kLBPs-0031bF-FZ Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/5] ext4: Use generic casefolding support X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Theodore Y . Ts'o" , Daniel Rosenberg , Richard Weinberger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger , Alexander Viro , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Eric Biggers writes: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 01:01:47AM +0000, Daniel Rosenberg wrote: >> This switches ext4 over to the generic support provided in >> the previous patch. >> >> Since casefolded dentries behave the same in ext4 and f2fs, we decrease >> the maintenance burden by unifying them, and any optimizations will >> immediately apply to both. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg >> Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers > > You could also add Gabriel's Reviewed-by from last time: > https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/87lfh4djdq.fsf@collabora.com/ Yep, I was gonna say that. Assuming nothing changed from the last submission in the other series. Thanks, -- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel