From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B9CC433DF for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 01:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C30D320888 for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 01:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="VpqXVQ6L"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="H/NbLoMZ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C30D320888 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1je7dr-0003wL-OG; Thu, 28 May 2020 01:47:31 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1je7dq-0003wF-Ke for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 28 May 2020 01:47:30 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xN4m7skEpzGPr9jgoMYo4IL5slVoq9r3cGRyctEILeQ=; b=VpqXVQ6L8y5GOiNgxKDltjABUq p/o45+7ATsQuMGDbxygIZcJFcJhZJUUtZpPNyY1Yyqrdvg/U8wvk8WfjYaE6q3dZw2uPrDTyKpAzg mxnaZJ7uNtbCSKt9mbSChu6d7wwFznFpdI5xTDaJEbuD3rX5TD9X/6Rok05/AKdI+4qo=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xN4m7skEpzGPr9jgoMYo4IL5slVoq9r3cGRyctEILeQ=; b=H/NbLoMZjtPnrCig7iogkuSZbk b+I9Tj7nvRdVCReMt1zfW+7FH3bJKo+RaOqGFETtCOkvCu3y3TGPhKspzpytK0xMxRL2hLMd93bdI ZyWk5ftrV9q9hVdRAO4Sy39W4Qp5fvg8CFX14B85lq7Mdg6zNBI8kVWjnStZ0v51n+TY=; Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-4.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1je7do-000xuA-Gp for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 28 May 2020 01:47:30 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 7826F79C38DB58841F19; Thu, 28 May 2020 09:47:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 28 May 2020 09:47:16 +0800 To: Jaegeuk Kim References: <20200527102753.15743-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> <20200527102753.15743-3-yuchao0@huawei.com> <20200527210233.GC206249@google.com> <23245f6e-528d-43ab-57b6-4ca16db43fe5@huawei.com> <20200528012615.GA232094@google.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <8e30b18d-bf8e-dd2f-35fa-08bbfd1b507e@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 09:47:15 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200528012615.GA232094@google.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1je7do-000xuA-Gp Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: fix to cover meta flush with cp_lock X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2020/5/28 9:26, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 05/28, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2020/5/28 5:02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> On 05/27, Chao Yu wrote: >>>> meta inode page should be flushed under cp_lock, fix it. >>> >>> It doesn't matter for this case, yes? >> >> It's not related to discard issue. > > I meant we really need this or not. :P Yes, let's keep that rule: flush meta pages under cp_lock, otherwise checkpoint flush order may be broken due to race, right? as checkpoint should write 2rd cp park page after flushing all meta pages. > >> >> Now, I got some progress, I can reproduce that bug occasionally. >> >> Thanks, >> >>> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu >>>> --- >>>> fs/f2fs/file.c | 2 ++ >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>> index f7de2a1da528..0fcae4d90074 100644 >>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>> @@ -2260,7 +2260,9 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_shutdown(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg) >>>> set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_SHUTDOWN); >>>> break; >>>> case F2FS_GOING_DOWN_METAFLUSH: >>>> + mutex_lock(&sbi->cp_mutex); >>>> f2fs_sync_meta_pages(sbi, META, LONG_MAX, FS_META_IO); >>>> + mutex_unlock(&sbi->cp_mutex); >>>> f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, false); >>>> set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_SHUTDOWN); >>>> break; >>>> -- >>>> 2.18.0.rc1 >>> . >>> > . > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel