Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] f2fs: pass I_NEW flag to trace event

[Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>]

On 2023/5/17 11:59, Wu Bo wrote:
> On 2023/5/17 10:44, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2023/5/16 20:07, Wu Bo wrote:
>>> Modify the order between 'trace_f2fs_iget' & 'unlock_new_inode', so the
>>> I_NEW can pass to the trace event when the inode initialised.
>>
>> Why is it needed? And trace_f2fs_iget() won't print inode->i_state?
> 
> When connect a trace_probe to f2fs_iget, it will be able to determine whether
> the inode is new initialised in order to do different process.

I didn't get it, you want to hook __tracepoint_f2fs_iget() w/ your own callback?

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <bo.wu@vivo.com>
>>> ---
>>>    fs/f2fs/inode.c | 2 +-
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
>>> index cf4327ad106c..caf959289fe7 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
>>> @@ -577,8 +577,8 @@ struct inode *f2fs_iget(struct super_block *sb,
>>> unsigned long ino)
>>>            file_dont_truncate(inode);
>>>        }
>>>    -    unlock_new_inode(inode);
>>>        trace_f2fs_iget(inode);
>>> +    unlock_new_inode(inode);
>>>        return inode;
>>>      bad_inode:
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>>


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel