From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:06:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97193665-85ae-268f-c50c-8b29bc4b57c7@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170105194604.GA2064@jaegeuk.local>
On 2017/1/6 3:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 01/05, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/1/4 17:29, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2016/12/31 2:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>> This patch relaxes async discard commands to avoid waiting its end_io during
>>>> checkpoint.
>>>> Instead of waiting them during checkpoint, it will be done when actually reusing
>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>> Test on initial partition of nvme drive.
>>>>
>>>> # time fstrim /mnt/test
>>>>
>>>> Before : 6.158s
>>>> After : 4.822s
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>>>
>>> One comment below,
>>
>> I still have a comment on this patch.
>>
>>>> -void f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>> +/* This should be covered by global mutex, &sit_i->sentry_lock */
>>>> +void f2fs_wait_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno)
>>>> {
>>>> struct list_head *wait_list = &(SM_I(sbi)->wait_list);
>>>> struct bio_entry *be, *tmp;
>>>> @@ -646,7 +650,15 @@ void f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>> struct bio *bio = be->bio;
>>>> int err;
>>>>
>>>> - wait_for_completion_io(&be->event);
>>>> + if (!completion_done(&be->event)) {
>>>> + if ((be->start_segno >= segno &&
>>>> + be->end_segno <= segno) ||
>>>
>>> segno >= be->start_segno && segno < be->end_segno ?
Still can not understand this judgment condition, we should wait completion of
discard command only when segno is locate in range of [start_segno, end_segno]?
But now, this condition can be true only when segno, start_segno, end_segno have
equal value.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks,
>>
>> Can you check this?
>
> The be->start_segno and be->end_segno are assigned by:
>
> unsigned int start_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkstart);
> unsigned int end_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkstart + blklen);
>
> in __f2fs_issue_discard_async().
>
> So, the problem comes when, for example, blkstart = 0 and blklen = 512.
>
> I should have got the end_segno by:
>
> unsigned int end_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkstart + blklen - 1);
>
> Thanks,
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-06 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-30 18:51 [PATCH 01/10] f2fs: reassign new segment for mode=lfs Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 02/10] f2fs: fix wrong tracepoints for op and op_flags Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04 3:25 ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 03/10] f2fs: add submit_bio tracepoint Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04 3:32 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-01-04 23:35 ` [PATCH 03/10 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:07 ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 04/10] f2fs: support IO alignment for DATA and NODE writes Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04 8:23 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-01-04 23:44 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:15 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 05/10] f2fs: get io size bit from mount option Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 06/10] f2fs: show the max number of atomic operations Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04 8:45 ` Chao Yu
2017-01-04 23:50 ` [PATCH 06/10 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:15 ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 07/10] f2fs: don't allow encrypted operations without keys Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04 8:56 ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04 9:29 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-01-05 3:19 ` Chao Yu
2017-01-05 8:17 ` Chao Yu
2017-01-05 19:59 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-05 19:46 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-06 2:06 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2017-01-06 2:42 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-06 3:32 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2017-02-22 7:23 ` Chao Yu
2017-02-22 21:15 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-23 2:08 ` Chao Yu
2017-02-23 2:42 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 09/10] f2fs: avoid needless checkpoint in f2fs_trim_fs Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-22 7:23 ` Chao Yu
2016-12-30 18:51 ` [PATCH 10/10] f2fs: return fs_trim if there is no candidate Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-22 7:23 ` Chao Yu
2017-02-22 21:26 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-02-23 2:12 ` Chao Yu
2017-02-23 2:47 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-04 3:24 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 01/10] f2fs: reassign new segment for mode=lfs Chao Yu
2017-01-04 22:48 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2017-01-12 11:03 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97193665-85ae-268f-c50c-8b29bc4b57c7@huawei.com \
--to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).