From: Eugen Hristev via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com, tytso@mit.edu,
jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v16 3/9] libfs: Introduce case-insensitive string comparison helper
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 17:02:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9afebadd-765f-42f3-a80b-366dd749bf48@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875xviyb3f.fsf@mailhost.krisman.be>
On 5/13/24 00:27, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 03:13:26PM +0300, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>
>>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fscrypt_has_encryption_key(parent)))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + decrypted_name.name = kmalloc(de_name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!decrypted_name.name)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> + res = fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr(parent, 0, 0, &encrypted_name,
>>> + &decrypted_name);
>>> + if (res < 0)
>>> + goto out;
>>
>> If fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr() returns an error and !sb_has_strict_encoding(sb),
>> then this function returns 0 (indicating no match) instead of the error code
>> (indicating an error). Is that the correct behavior? I would think that
>> strict_encoding should only have an effect on the actual name
>> comparison.
>
> No. we *want* this return code to be propagated back to f2fs. In ext4 it
> wouldn't matter since the error is not visible outside of ext4_match,
> but f2fs does the right thing and stops the lookup.
In the previous version which I sent, you told me that the error should be
propagated only in strict_mode, and if !strict_mode, it should just return no match.
Originally I did not understand that this should be done only for utf8_strncasecmp
errors, and not for all the errors. I will change it here to fix that.
>
> Thinking about it, there is a second problem with this series.
> Currently, if we are on strict_mode, f2fs_match_ci_name does not
> propagate unicode errors back to f2fs. So, once a utf8 invalid sequence
> is found during lookup, it will be considered not-a-match but the lookup
> will continue. This allows some lookups to succeed even in a corrupted
> directory. With this patch, we will abort the lookup on the first
> error, breaking existing semantics. Note that these are different from
> memory allocation failure and fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr. For those, it
> makes sense to abort.
So , in the case of f2fs , we must not propagate utf8 errors ? It should just
return no match even in strict mode ?
If this helper is common for both f2fs and ext4, we have to do the same for ext4 ?
Or we are no longer able to commonize the code altogether ?
>
> Also, once patch 6 and 7 are added, if fscrypt fails with -EINVAL for
> any reason unrelated to unicode (like in the WARN_ON above), we will
> incorrectly print the error message saying there is a bad UTF8 string.
>
> My suggestion would be to keep the current behavior. Make
> generic_ci_match only propagate non-unicode related errors back to the
> filesystem. This means that we need to move the error messages in patch
> 6 and 7 into this function, so they only trigger when utf8_strncasecmp*
> itself fails.
>
So basically unicode errors stop here, and print the error message here in that case.
Am I understanding it correctly ?
>>> + /*
>>> + * Attempt a case-sensitive match first. It is cheaper and
>>> + * should cover most lookups, including all the sane
>>> + * applications that expect a case-sensitive filesystem.
>>> + */
>>> + if (folded_name->name) {
>>> + if (dirent.len == folded_name->len &&
>>> + !memcmp(folded_name->name, dirent.name, dirent.len))
>>> + goto out;
>>> + res = utf8_strncasecmp_folded(um, folded_name, &dirent);
>>
>> Shouldn't the memcmp be done with the original user-specified name, not the
>> casefolded name? I would think that the user-specified name is the one that's
>> more likely to match the on-disk name, because of case preservation. In most
>> cases users will specify the same case on both file creation and later access.
>
> Yes.
>
so the utf8_strncasecmp_folded call here must use name->name instead of folded_name ?
Thanks for the review
Eugen
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-22 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-05 12:13 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v16 0/9] Cache insensitive cleanup for ext4/f2fs Eugen Hristev via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-04-05 12:13 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v16 1/9] ext4: Simplify the handling of cached insensitive names Eugen Hristev via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-05-10 1:23 ` Eric Biggers
2024-04-05 12:13 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v16 2/9] f2fs: " Eugen Hristev via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-05-10 1:23 ` Eric Biggers
2024-04-05 12:13 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v16 3/9] libfs: Introduce case-insensitive string comparison helper Eugen Hristev via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-05-10 1:33 ` Eric Biggers
2024-05-12 21:27 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-05-22 14:02 ` Eugen Hristev via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2024-05-22 23:05 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-05-26 11:49 ` Eugen Hristev via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-05-27 20:54 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-04-05 12:13 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v16 4/9] ext4: Reuse generic_ci_match for ci comparisons Eugen Hristev via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-05-10 1:23 ` Eric Biggers
2024-04-05 12:13 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v16 5/9] f2fs: " Eugen Hristev via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-05-10 1:24 ` Eric Biggers
2024-04-05 12:13 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v16 6/9] ext4: Log error when lookup of encoded dentry fails Eugen Hristev via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-05-10 1:24 ` Eric Biggers
2024-04-05 12:13 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v16 7/9] f2fs: " Eugen Hristev via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-05-10 1:25 ` Eric Biggers
2024-04-05 12:13 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v16 8/9] ext4: Move CONFIG_UNICODE defguards into the code flow Eugen Hristev via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-05-10 1:25 ` Eric Biggers
2024-04-05 12:13 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v16 9/9] f2fs: " Eugen Hristev via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-05-10 1:25 ` Eric Biggers
2024-04-05 12:18 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v16 0/9] Cache insensitive cleanup for ext4/f2fs Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-05 13:02 ` Eugen Hristev via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-04-05 16:37 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2024-05-09 15:12 ` Eugen Hristev via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-07-24 2:16 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9afebadd-765f-42f3-a80b-366dd749bf48@collabora.com \
--to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=eugen.hristev@collabora.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=krisman@collabora.com \
--cc=krisman@suse.de \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).