From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: "Nikola Z. Ivanov" <zlatistiv@gmail.com>
Cc: david.hunter.linux@gmail.com,
syzbot+c07d47c7bc68f47b9083@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, khalid@kernel.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Perform sanity check before unlinking directory inode
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 20:53:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d0fef9d-4093-4a80-af3f-6dc45ffe886c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gupgic53ouhmdwrglwdviw2mzeaqfjsvyr47u3ebu2ztayswy4@4oxvnu252rdb>
On 10/13/25 05:19, Nikola Z. Ivanov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 10:54:40AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 10/3/2025 9:47 PM, Nikola Z. Ivanov wrote:
>>> Current i_nlink corruption check does not take into account
>>> directory inodes which have one additional i_nlink for their "." entry.
>>>
>>> Add additional check and a common corruption path.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: syzbot+c07d47c7bc68f47b9083@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>>> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c07d47c7bc68f47b9083
>>> Fixes: 81edb983b3f5 ("f2fs: add check for deleted inode")
>>> Signed-off-by: Nikola Z. Ivanov <zlatistiv@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/f2fs/namei.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
>>> index b882771e4699..68b33e8089b0 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
>>> @@ -502,12 +502,14 @@ static struct dentry *f2fs_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>> - if (inode->i_nlink == 0) {
>>> + if (unlikely(inode->i_nlink == 0)) {
>>> f2fs_warn(F2FS_I_SB(inode), "%s: inode (ino=%lx) has zero i_nlink",
>>> __func__, inode->i_ino);
>>> - err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
>>> - set_sbi_flag(F2FS_I_SB(inode), SBI_NEED_FSCK);
>>> - goto out_iput;
>>> + goto corrupted;
>>> + } else if (unlikely(S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) && inode->i_nlink == 1)) {
>>> + f2fs_warn(F2FS_I_SB(inode), "%s: directory inode (ino=%lx) has a single i_nlink",
>>> + __func__, inode->i_ino);
>>> + goto corrupted;
>>
>> Can we detect such corruption in sanity_check_inode() as well? So that if
>> f2fs internal flow calls f2fs_iget() on corrupted inode, we can set SBI_NEED_FSCK
>> flag and then triggering fsck repairment later.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>> }
>>> if (IS_ENCRYPTED(dir) &&
>>> @@ -533,6 +535,9 @@ static struct dentry *f2fs_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>>> trace_f2fs_lookup_end(dir, !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(new) ? new : dentry,
>>> ino, IS_ERR(new) ? PTR_ERR(new) : err);
>>> return new;
>>> +corrupted:
>>> + err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
>>> + set_sbi_flag(F2FS_I_SB(inode), SBI_NEED_FSCK);
>>> out_iput:
>>> iput(inode);
>>> out:
>>> @@ -572,10 +577,11 @@ static int f2fs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
>>> if (unlikely(inode->i_nlink == 0)) {
>>> f2fs_warn(F2FS_I_SB(inode), "%s: inode (ino=%lx) has zero i_nlink",
>>> __func__, inode->i_ino);
>>> - err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
>>> - set_sbi_flag(F2FS_I_SB(inode), SBI_NEED_FSCK);
>>> - f2fs_folio_put(folio, false);
>>> - goto fail;
>>> + goto corrupted;
>>> + } else if (unlikely(S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) && inode->i_nlink == 1)) {
>>> + f2fs_warn(F2FS_I_SB(inode), "%s: directory inode (ino=%lx) has a single i_nlink",
>>> + __func__, inode->i_ino);
>>> + goto corrupted;
>>> }
>>> f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
>>> @@ -601,6 +607,12 @@ static int f2fs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
>>> if (IS_DIRSYNC(dir))
>>> f2fs_sync_fs(sbi->sb, 1);
>>> +
>>> + goto fail;
>>> +corrupted:
>>> + err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
>>> + set_sbi_flag(F2FS_I_SB(inode), SBI_NEED_FSCK);
>>> + f2fs_folio_put(folio, false);
>>> fail:
>>> trace_f2fs_unlink_exit(inode, err);
>>> return err;
>>
>
> Hi Chao,
>
> Thank you for the suggestion.
> I will add this to sanity_check_inode and remove it
> from f2fs_lookup as it becomes redundant since f2fs_lookup
> obtains the inode through f2fs_iget. For f2fs_unlink I will
> move the i_nlink == 1 check to f2fs_rmdir.
Hi Nikola,
I meant we can move the i_nlink == 1 check from both f2fs_lookup() and
f2fs_unlink() to sanity_check_inode(), because before we create in-memory
inode, we will always call sanity_check_inode().
Let me know if you have other concerns.
Thanks,
>
> I will send v2 as soon as I do some more testing.
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-13 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-03 13:47 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: Perform sanity check before unlinking directory inode Nikola Z. Ivanov
2025-10-07 23:08 ` Shuah Khan
2025-10-09 2:54 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-10-12 21:19 ` Nikola Z. Ivanov
2025-10-13 12:53 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2025-10-14 12:17 ` Nikola Z. Ivanov
2025-10-15 6:41 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-10-15 12:55 ` Nikola Z. Ivanov
2025-10-23 19:15 ` Nikola Z. Ivanov
2025-10-27 8:12 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d0fef9d-4093-4a80-af3f-6dc45ffe886c@kernel.org \
--to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=david.hunter.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=khalid@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=syzbot+c07d47c7bc68f47b9083@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=zlatistiv@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).