From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: huang ying Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:51:11 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20160718020950.GB4986@yexl-desktop> <87twfmsndf.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com> <87bn18cvuu.fsf_-_@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com> <20160804172452.GA12093@jaegeuk> <874m70ctu3.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com> <20160804185251.GA13813@jaegeuk> <87r3a4b7b6.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com> <87vaz6yl8a.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com> <20160812012238.GA47037@jaegeuk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1bcbOY-0003UB-HU for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:51:18 +0000 Received: from mail-qk0-f194.google.com ([209.85.220.194]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1bcbOX-0000QS-Q7 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:51:18 +0000 Received: by mail-qk0-f194.google.com with SMTP id n66so1580606qkf.0 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:51:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160812012238.GA47037@jaegeuk> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jaegeuk Kim Cc: LKML , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, LKP ML , kernel test robot , "Huang, Ying" Hi, Jaegeuk, On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote: >> Hi, Kim, >> >> "Huang, Ying" writes: >> >> >> >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression >> >> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression >> >> >> >> In terms of the above regression, I could check that _reproduce_ procedure >> >> includes mounting filesystem only. Is that correct? >> > >> > Sorry, our test system failed to generate reproduce steps for aim7. We >> > will implement it. >> > >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression >> > >> > The disk is one 48G ram disk. The steps for aim7 is, >> > >> > cat > workfile <> > FILESIZE: 1M >> > POOLSIZE: 10M >> > 10 disk_cp >> > EOF >> > >> > ( >> > echo $HOSTNAME >> > echo disk_cp >> > >> > echo 1 >> > echo 3000 >> > echo 2 >> > echo 3000 >> > echo 1 >> > ) | ./multitask -t & >> > >> > >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression >> > >> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm. The >> > steps for aim7 is, >> > >> > cat > workfile <> > FILESIZE: 1M >> > POOLSIZE: 10M >> > 10 sync_disk_rw >> > EOF >> > >> > ( >> > echo $HOSTNAME >> > echo sync_disk_rw >> > >> > echo 1 >> > echo 600 >> > echo 2 >> > echo 600 >> > echo 1 >> > ) | ./multitask -t & >> >> Any update on these 2 regressions? Is the information is enough for you >> to reproduce? > > Sorry, I've had no time to dig this due to business travel now. > I'll check that when back to US. Any update? Best Regards, Huang, Ying ------------------------------------------------------------------------------