linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juhyung Park <qkrwngud825@gmail.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] EIO returned when reading files from R/O, compressed f2fs image
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 17:43:04 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD14+f2nSy710HggEVfzRAipL_7F=HHmqc9mG4oyLrn2=AhzXw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YjD78BmHAKBHj3wN@google.com>

Hi Jaegeuk,

I'll perform the trace debugging later.

Meanwhile, we encountered another issue.

For now, I added a workaround that performs mlockall() on all files
(vmtouch -L $val.mount -d -w -P $val.vmtouch) under the f2fs partition
so that the cp command works.

After confirming that extraction works, I've parallelized the script
again (on our production server again, so v5.15 without f2fs-stable
backports) and while userspace processes don't complain, there's
something going on on dmesg:

[224319.321668] loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 11041080
[224319.361530] F2FS-fs (loop0): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[224319.365029] F2FS-fs (loop0): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[224319.365033] F2FS-fs (loop0): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[224340.047471] loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 11769352
[224340.101509] F2FS-fs (loop1): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[224340.103799] F2FS-fs (loop1): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[224340.103802] F2FS-fs (loop1): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[224361.763528] loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 11386480
[224361.812891] F2FS-fs (loop2): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[224361.814881] F2FS-fs (loop2): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[224361.814886] F2FS-fs (loop2): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[224386.701011] F2FS-fs (loop2): lz4 invalid rlen:16384, expected:16384
[224386.701248] F2FS-fs (loop2): lz4 invalid rlen:16384, expected:16384
[224386.701779] F2FS-fs (loop2): lz4 invalid rlen:16384, expected:16384
[224386.701806] F2FS-fs (loop2): lz4 invalid rlen:16384, expected:16384
[224386.701826] F2FS-fs (loop2): lz4 invalid rlen:16384, expected:16384
[224391.823216] loop3: detected capacity change from 0 to 11045240
[224391.884383] F2FS-fs (loop3): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[224392.194608] F2FS-fs (loop3): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[224392.194612] F2FS-fs (loop3): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[224401.386330] loop4: detected capacity change from 0 to 11428112
[224401.424575] F2FS-fs (loop4): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[224401.428872] F2FS-fs (loop4): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[224401.428875] F2FS-fs (loop4): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[224576.100839] loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 11041080
[224576.140862] F2FS-fs (loop0): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[224576.142694] F2FS-fs (loop0): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[224576.142699] F2FS-fs (loop0): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[224599.330003] loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 2913344
[224599.360425] F2FS-fs (loop1): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[224599.362257] F2FS-fs (loop1): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[224599.362260] F2FS-fs (loop1): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[224602.241868] loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 2064344
[224602.276146] F2FS-fs (loop2): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[224602.277955] F2FS-fs (loop2): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[224602.277971] F2FS-fs (loop2): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[224629.346056] loop3: detected capacity change from 0 to 41776
[224629.375324] F2FS-fs (loop3): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[224629.377167] F2FS-fs (loop3): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[224629.377170] F2FS-fs (loop3): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225029.224078] loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 11411472
[225029.270396] F2FS-fs (loop0): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225029.271345] F2FS-fs (loop0): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225029.271348] F2FS-fs (loop0): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225625.045254] loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 11045240
[225625.078435] F2FS-fs (loop0): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225625.079453] F2FS-fs (loop0): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225625.079455] F2FS-fs (loop0): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225651.466438] loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 11428112
[225651.532489] F2FS-fs (loop1): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225651.582589] F2FS-fs (loop1): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225651.582594] F2FS-fs (loop1): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225653.729775] loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 2896696
[225653.817115] F2FS-fs (loop2): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225653.842649] F2FS-fs (loop2): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225653.842654] F2FS-fs (loop2): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225665.480652] loop3: detected capacity change from 0 to 2064344
[225665.548952] F2FS-fs (loop3): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225665.551460] F2FS-fs (loop3): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225665.551465] F2FS-fs (loop3): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225687.173551] loop4: detected capacity change from 0 to 3753984
[225687.297132] F2FS-fs (loop4): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225687.299702] F2FS-fs (loop4): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225687.299705] F2FS-fs (loop4): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225694.934235] loop5: detected capacity change from 0 to 1868760
[225695.047462] F2FS-fs (loop5): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225695.049562] F2FS-fs (loop5): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225695.049567] F2FS-fs (loop5): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225704.254531] loop6: detected capacity change from 0 to 41776
[225704.282972] F2FS-fs (loop6): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225704.286725] F2FS-fs (loop6): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225704.286730] F2FS-fs (loop6): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225723.689515] loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 11411472
[225723.723250] F2FS-fs (loop0): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225723.725740] F2FS-fs (loop0): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225723.725744] F2FS-fs (loop0): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225727.574004] loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 11386480
[225727.621016] F2FS-fs (loop2): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225727.623296] F2FS-fs (loop2): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225727.623300] F2FS-fs (loop2): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225728.404524] loop3: detected capacity change from 0 to 41776
[225728.440403] F2FS-fs (loop3): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225728.442743] F2FS-fs (loop3): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225728.442748] F2FS-fs (loop3): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225731.328330] F2FS-fs (loop2): lz4 invalid rlen:16384, expected:16384
[225731.328400] F2FS-fs (loop2): lz4 invalid rlen:16384, expected:16384
[225731.328424] F2FS-fs (loop2): lz4 invalid rlen:16384, expected:16384
[225743.064116] loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 11769352
[225743.110306] F2FS-fs (loop1): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225743.113408] F2FS-fs (loop1): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225743.113414] F2FS-fs (loop1): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225761.148410] loop3: detected capacity change from 0 to 3758152
[225761.195014] F2FS-fs (loop3): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225761.196431] F2FS-fs (loop3): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225761.196432] F2FS-fs (loop3): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225766.885693] loop4: detected capacity change from 0 to 1868760
[225767.010849] F2FS-fs (loop4): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225767.013024] F2FS-fs (loop4): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225767.013027] F2FS-fs (loop4): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225781.475142] loop5: detected capacity change from 0 to 3766472
[225781.500625] F2FS-fs (loop5): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225781.503148] F2FS-fs (loop5): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225781.503150] F2FS-fs (loop5): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225785.367635] loop6: detected capacity change from 0 to 1868760
[225785.474029] F2FS-fs (loop6): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225785.475673] F2FS-fs (loop6): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225785.475678] F2FS-fs (loop6): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225802.664721] loop7: detected capacity change from 0 to 41776
[225802.706846] F2FS-fs (loop7): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225802.709092] F2FS-fs (loop7): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225802.709095] F2FS-fs (loop7): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321
[225812.972186] loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 41776
[225813.000175] F2FS-fs (loop0): Found nat_bits in checkpoint
[225813.003617] F2FS-fs (loop0): write access unavailable, skipping recovery
[225813.003619] F2FS-fs (loop0): Mounted with checkpoint version = 4321

Those "lz4 invalid rlen:16384, expected:16384", is this normal?

Thanks.

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 5:49 AM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 03/15, Juhyung Park wrote:
> > Here's strace from both commands right after drop_caches.
> >
> > cp: https://pastebin.com/raw/GH51BjV4
> > tar: https://pastebin.com/raw/0wgiu7fE
>
> Can we catch who sets EIO?
>
> # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/f2fs/f2fs_readpage/enable
> # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/f2fs/f2fs_readpages/enable
> # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/f2fs/f2fs_decompress_pages_start/enable
> # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/f2fs/f2fs_decompress_pages_end/enable
> # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/tracing_on
> # cat /sys/kernel/tracing/trace_pipe
>
> >
> > It seems that cp is calling a few extra fadvise and ioctl.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 7:25 PM Juhyung Park <qkrwngud825@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Chao,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 5:45 PM Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Juhyung,
> > > >
> > > > On 2022/3/15 16:37, Juhyung Park wrote:
> > > > > Hi Chao,
> > > > >
> > > > > I actually have never used compression on f2fs yet and this image is
> > > > > from an unmodified firmware taken directly from the OTA server, not
> > > > > made by me.
> > > >
> > > > Alright.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > If you can tell me how to check if the file is compressed or not, I'll
> > > > > run it and report back.
> > > >
> > > > lsattr <target_file_path> |grep c
> > > >
> > > > You can check the flag's mean in manual of chattr.
> > >
> > > Ah, didn't know that lsattr shows compressed state.
> > > It seems that every single file under that system partition is
> > > compressed except ones with file size of < 4096, but the error only
> > > happens on select files.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I never had this sort of issue (a lot of multiple readers causing
> > > > > troubles) before with a regular R/W, uncompressed f2fs partition, so
> > > > > I'm guessing it has something to do with RO or compression feature.
> > > >
> > > > Agreed, maybe we can repacking image to RO one or compressed one to
> > > > check which one can cause this issue?
> > >
> > > Is this easy to do standalone?
> > >
> > > AOSP's ext4 image creation was already super complicated to do
> > > out-of-tree with their dedup and minimizing file size (so that the
> > > resulting image is as small as possible) thinggies going on. I think
> > > I've seen EROFS support but I don't know how f2fs system images are
> > > handled under AOSP.
> > >
> > > Also, I moved the environment to my personal laptop. It's running
> > > v5.15.28 with the latest f2fs-stable/linux-5.15.y merged and it still
> > > happens there.
> > >
> > > One weird thing that I've been able to confirm is that it seems that
> > > multiple readers are not the problem:
> > > #!/bin/bash
> > >
> > > set -v
> > >
> > > APK=system/app/some_app/some_app.apk
> > >
> > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> > > tar -pcf - $APK | cat > /dev/null     # Works!
> > > cp $APK /tmp                          # Works!
> > >
> > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> > > tar -pcf - $APK | cat > /dev/null     # Works!
> > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> > > cp $APK /tmp                          # cp: error reading
> > > 'system/app/some_app/some_app.apk': Input/output error
> > >
> > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> > > cp $APK /tmp                          # cp: error reading
> > > 'system/app/some_app/some_app.apk': Input/output error
> > > tar -pcf - $APK | cat > /dev/null     # tar:
> > > system/app/some_app/some_app.apk: File shrank by 3375397 bytes;
> > > padding with zeros
> > >
> > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> > > cp $APK /tmp                          # cp: error reading
> > > 'system/app/some_app/some_app.apk': Input/output error
> > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> > > tar -pcf - $APK | cat > /dev/null     # Works!
> > >
> > > I'm guessing some system-calls that cp use causes f2fs to malfunction.
> > > (GNU tar is smart enough to detect if the output is /dev/null, so it
> > > skips the actual file read when it is piped directly to /dev/null, so
> > > I added `cat` in between.)
> > >
> > > Hope this new info helps.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 5:33 PM Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 2022/3/14 1:52, Juhyung Park wrote:
> > > > >>> Hi.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> We have a production server storing some Android firmwares over a ZFS
> > > > >>> file-system, and we noticed some issues when extracting firmware files
> > > > >>> that use f2fs for Android system partitions.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> This is a proprietary environment, so I cannot disclose every detail,
> > > > >>> so I hope you understand. I'll try to elaborate as much as I can.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The server is running Ubuntu 20.04 with Linux v5.15 (recently upgraded
> > > > >>> from v5.13 after noticing RO feature added on v5.14 being required).
> > > > >>> We have a set of scripts extracting Android firmware files. The input
> > > > >>> is typically the OTA zip file and after going through the script, it
> > > > >>> extracts every file and binary image from a given file.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> So that includes extracting super (dynamic partition), ext4 system
> > > > >>> partitions with dedup enabled, and now, f2fs system partitions with RO
> > > > >>> and compression enabled.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Our script never had to deal with f2fs before as we only started
> > > > >>> seeing f2fs system partitions with recently released devices.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> This is the f2fs mount flag after mounting with `mount -o ro
> > > > >>> system.raw /some/dir`:
> > > > >>> ro,relatime,lazytime,background_gc=on,discard,no_heap,user_xattr,inline_xattr,acl,inline_data,inline_dentry,extent_cache,mode=adaptive,active_logs=2,alloc_mode=reuse,checkpoint_merge,fsync_mode=posix,compress_algorithm=lz4,compress_log_size=2,compress_mode=fs,discard_unit=block
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> There are *a lot* of files in Android firmware these days, so we try
> > > > >>> to parallelize parts when we can.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> This is a snippet of the script:
> > > > >>> ```
> > > > >>> #!/bin/bash
> > > > >>> <...>
> > > > >>> RSYNC="rsync -ahAXx --inplace --numeric-ids"
> > > > >>> <...>
> > > > >>> for val in system vendor product odm; do
> > > > >>>     if ! ls images/$val.raw > /dev/null 2>&1; then continue; fi
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>     mkdir -p fs
> > > > >>>     cd fs
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>     mkdir -p $val.mount tmp_$val
> > > > >>>     mount -o ro ../images/$val.raw $val.mount
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>     $RSYNC $val.mount/ "$DEST_PWD/fs/$val/" &
> > > > >>>     echo $! > $val.pid
> > > > >>>     disown
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>     cd $val.mount
> > > > >>>     find . -type d -exec mkdir -p "$DEST_PWD/strings/$val/"{} \;
> > > > >>>     find . -type d -exec mkdir -p "../tmp_$val/"{} \;
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>     while read file; do strings "$file" > "$DEST_PWD/strings/$val/$file"
> > > > >>> & done < <(find . -type f | grep -v '\.apk\|\.jar\|\.zip')
> > > > >>>     wait
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> <...>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>     cd ../
> > > > >>>     rm -rf tmp_$val
> > > > >>>     cd ../
> > > > >>> done
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> wait
> > > > >>> <...>
> > > > >>> for val in system vendor product odm; do
> > > > >>>     if ! ls images/$val.raw > /dev/null 2>&1; then continue; fi
> > > > >>>     tail --pid=$(cat fs/$val.pid) -f /dev/null
> > > > >>>     umount fs/$val.mount
> > > > >>>     rmdir fs/$val.mount
> > > > >>>     rm -f images/$val.img images/$val.raw 2>/dev/null
> > > > >>> done
> > > > >>> ```
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The offending part is:
> > > > >>> ```
> > > > >>>     $RSYNC $val.mount/ "$DEST_PWD/fs/$val/" &
> > > > >>>     find . -type d -exec mkdir -p "$DEST_PWD/strings/$val/"{} \;
> > > > >>>     find . -type d -exec mkdir -p "../tmp_$val/"{} \;
> > > > >>>     while read file; do strings "$file" > "$DEST_PWD/strings/$val/$file"
> > > > >>> & done < <(find . -type f | grep -v '\.apk\|\.jar\|\.zip')
> > > > >>>     wait
> > > > >>> ```
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> When that part is reached, the script forks thousands of new processes
> > > > >>> and starts reading from f2fs. (We simply decided to rely on Linux's
> > > > >>> task scheduler and didn't bother to limit the number of
> > > > >>> sub-processes.)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I am able to reliably cause f2fs to return EIO on some files:
> > > > >>> cp: error reading './system/priv-app/some_apk_1/some_apk_1.apk':
> > > > >>> Input/output error
> > > > >>> cp: error reading './system/priv-app/some_apk_2/some_apk_2.apk':
> > > > >>> Input/output error
> > > > >>> cp: error reading './system/priv-app/some_apk_3/some_apk_3.apk':
> > > > >>> Input/output error
> > > > >>> rsync: [sender] read errors mapping
> > > > >>> "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_1/some_apk_1.apk":
> > > > >>> Input/output error (5)
> > > > >>> rsync: [sender] read errors mapping
> > > > >>> "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_2/some_apk_2.apk":
> > > > >>> Input/output error (5)
> > > > >>> rsync: [sender] read errors mapping
> > > > >>> "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_3/some_apk_3.apk":
> > > > >>> Input/output error (5)
> > > > >>> rsync: [sender] read errors mapping
> > > > >>> "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_1/some_apk_1.apk":
> > > > >>> Input/output error (5)
> > > > >>> ERROR: system/priv-app/some_apk_1/some_apk_1.apk failed verification
> > > > >>> -- update retained.
> > > > >>> rsync: [sender] read errors mapping
> > > > >>> "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_2/some_apk_2.apk":
> > > > >>> Input/output error (5)
> > > > >>> ERROR: system/priv-app/some_apk_2/some_apk_2.apk failed verification
> > > > >>> -- update retained.
> > > > >>> rsync: [sender] read errors mapping
> > > > >>> "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_3/some_apk_3.apk":
> > > > >>> Input/output error (5)
> > > > >>> ERROR: system/priv-app/some_apk_3/some_apk_3.apk failed verification
> > > > >>> -- update retained.
> > > > >>> rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous
> > > > >>> errors) (code 23) at main.c(1333) [sender=v3.2.3-45-ga28c4558]
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi Juhyung,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Do you enable compression on specified files? if so, do all EIOs come from compressed
> > > > >> file?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The dmesg remains silent.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> When I modify the script a little bit and force it to run in a
> > > > >>> single-thread (by removing &), it runs well.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I was able to confirm that it isn't a memory issue. The server has
> > > > >>> 50G+ of free memory, and the issue is still reliably reproducible when
> > > > >>> I defragment the memory by dropping caches and doing `echo 1 >
> > > > >>> /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory`.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I wasn't able to test any recent kernels (v5.16 or v5.17) as it's
> > > > >>> unsupported by ZFS. And it being a production server, I am somewhat
> > > > >>> limited in dabbling around the kernel.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I am planning to test a new kernel with v5.15 +
> > > > >>> f2fs-stable/linux-5.15.y merged. Meanwhile, if this is a new report or
> > > > >>> fixed with newer commits, I'd appreciate a tip.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > > >>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > > > >>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-16  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-13 17:52 [f2fs-dev] EIO returned when reading files from R/O, compressed f2fs image Juhyung Park
2022-03-15  0:30 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-03-15  4:42   ` Juhyung Park
2022-03-15  8:33 ` Chao Yu
2022-03-15  8:37   ` Juhyung Park
2022-03-15  8:45     ` Chao Yu
2022-03-15 10:25       ` Juhyung Park
2022-03-15 10:48         ` Juhyung Park
2022-03-15 20:49           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-03-16  8:43             ` Juhyung Park [this message]
2022-03-16 10:00               ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAD14+f2nSy710HggEVfzRAipL_7F=HHmqc9mG4oyLrn2=AhzXw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=qkrwngud825@gmail.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).