linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, "Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] libfs: Add generic function for setting dentry_ops
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:16:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <X7QTkSyiMojM6T10@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201117040315.28548-2-drosen@google.com>

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 04:03:13AM +0000, Daniel Rosenberg wrote:
> 
> Currently the casefolding dentry operation are always set if the
> filesystem defines an encoding because the features is toggleable on
> empty directories. Since we don't know what set of functions we'll
> eventually need, and cannot change them later, we add just add them.

This isn't a very useful explanation, since encryption can be toggled on empty
directories too (at least from off to on --- not the other way).  Why is
casefolding different?

> +static const struct dentry_operations generic_ci_dentry_ops = {
> +	.d_hash = generic_ci_d_hash,
> +	.d_compare = generic_ci_d_compare,
> +};
>  #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION
> +static const struct dentry_operations generic_encrypted_dentry_ops = {
> +	.d_revalidate = fscrypt_d_revalidate,
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION)
> +static const struct dentry_operations generic_encrypted_ci_dentry_ops = {
> +	.d_hash = generic_ci_d_hash,
> +	.d_compare = generic_ci_d_compare,
> +	.d_revalidate = fscrypt_d_revalidate,
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> +/**
> + * generic_set_encrypted_ci_d_ops - helper for setting d_ops for given dentry
> + * @dentry:	dentry to set ops on
> + *
> + * This function sets the dentry ops for the given dentry to handle both
> + * casefolded and encrypted dentry names.
> + *
> + * Encryption requires d_revalidate to remove nokey names once the key is present.
> + * Casefolding is toggleable on an empty directory. Since we can't change the
> + * operations later on, we just add the casefolding ops if the filesystem defines an
> + * encoding.
> + */

There are some overly long lines here (> 80 columns).

But more importantly this still isn't a good explanation.  Encryption can also
be enabled on empty directories; what makes casefolding different?

It's also not obvious why so many different copies of the dentry operations
needed, instead of just using generic_encrypted_ci_dentry_ops on all.

If I'm still struggling to understand this after following these patches for a
long time, I expect everyone else will have trouble too...

Here's a suggestion which I think explains it a lot better.  It's still possible
I'm misunderstanding something, though, so please check it carefully:

/**
 * generic_set_encrypted_ci_d_ops - helper for setting d_ops for given dentry
 * @dentry:	dentry to set ops on
 *
 * Casefolded directories need d_hash and d_compare set, so that the dentries
 * contained in them are handled case-insensitively.  Note that these operations
 * are needed on the parent directory rather than on the dentries in it, and the
 * casefolding flag can be enabled on an empty directory later but the
 * dentry_operations can't be changed later.  As a result, if the filesystem has
 * casefolding support enabled at all, we have to give all dentries the
 * casefolding operations even if their inode doesn't have the casefolding flag
 * currently (and thus the casefolding ops would be no-ops for now).
 *
 * Encryption works differently in that the only dentry operation it needs is
 * d_revalidate, which it only needs on dentries that have the no-key name flag.
 * The no-key flag can't be set "later", so we don't have to worry about that.
 *
 * Finally, to maximize compatibility with overlayfs (which isn't compatible
 * with certain dentry operations) and to avoid taking an unnecessary
 * performance hit, we use custom dentry_operations for each possible
 * combination rather always installing all operations.
 */

> +void generic_set_encrypted_ci_d_ops(struct dentry *dentry)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION
> +	bool needs_encrypt_ops = dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME;
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE
> +	bool needs_ci_ops = dentry->d_sb->s_encoding;
> +#endif
> +#if defined(CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION) && defined(CONFIG_UNICODE)
> +	if (needs_encrypt_ops && needs_ci_ops) {
> +		d_set_d_op(dentry, &generic_encrypted_ci_dentry_ops);
> +			return;
> +	}

The return statement above has the wrong indentation level.

> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION
> +	if (needs_encrypt_ops) {
> +		d_set_d_op(dentry, &generic_encrypted_dentry_ops);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_UNICODE
> +	if (needs_ci_ops) {
> +		d_set_d_op(dentry, &generic_ci_dentry_ops);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +#endif
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_set_encrypted_ci_d_ops);
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 8667d0cdc71e..11345e66353b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -3202,6 +3202,7 @@ extern int generic_ci_d_hash(const struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *str);
>  extern int generic_ci_d_compare(const struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int len,
>  				const char *str, const struct qstr *name);
>  #endif
> +extern void generic_set_encrypted_ci_d_ops(struct dentry *dentry);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
>  extern int buffer_migrate_page(struct address_space *,


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-17 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-17  4:03 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for Encryption and Casefolding in F2FS Daniel Rosenberg via Linux-f2fs-devel
2020-11-17  4:03 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] libfs: Add generic function for setting dentry_ops Daniel Rosenberg via Linux-f2fs-devel
2020-11-17 17:33   ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-11-17 18:16   ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2020-11-17 18:36     ` Eric Biggers
2020-11-17  4:03 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] fscrypt: Have filesystems handle their d_ops Daniel Rosenberg via Linux-f2fs-devel
2020-11-17 14:03   ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-11-17 17:04     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-11-17 17:34       ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-11-17 18:31   ` Eric Biggers
2020-11-17  4:03 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] f2fs: Handle casefolding with Encryption Daniel Rosenberg via Linux-f2fs-devel
2020-11-17 18:50   ` Eric Biggers
2020-11-18  6:22     ` Daniel Rosenberg via Linux-f2fs-devel
2020-11-18  6:27       ` Eric Biggers
2020-11-17 18:53 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for Encryption and Casefolding in F2FS Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=X7QTkSyiMojM6T10@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=drosen@google.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=krisman@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).