From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D969C63777 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 08:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5115C2074A; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 08:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="h8AQgQTe"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="GX2QX3BN"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="D8rIxGkT" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5115C2074A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjeHB-0000i4-3h; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 08:11:13 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjeHA-0000hr-AN for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 08:11:12 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Nuu4YhVKiwYDdBAbETDqObKR/AQGpXTkkY6/R+XVyDY=; b=h8AQgQTevq+2KJR3wf1sdTb6ii 4bLGHAIOpHw8lQSmS867KEGUEzaLK70zwOA3SyaKj/GLkyBoD2AWWeNzqZmVoGYRtbR/tKMTXx5UP 1PsFkEG/v8rW8sjGBUbkZpNquOl84sayrqAGTxOR1dok//07i6fnYvpfCHxFzwPLsQUk=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Nuu4YhVKiwYDdBAbETDqObKR/AQGpXTkkY6/R+XVyDY=; b=GX2QX3BNaXEi8sbn0r+pA7rr/O /k0Xt+ge+9Z+9APlWP4eVGk3jwJe03aey/rEN6EzxGsnrGeD2GK2DPYNk3Ye87/t4lw2FzQuNNpXy a355pFz4RyZUacopgRL+w0yMK7vru3eySyywjV6TDMAQMblnN5rlIAEKOWju+UqsREg8=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-3.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1kjeGz-00BDUH-Ly for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 08:11:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AAC220731; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 08:10:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1606723856; bh=BHjT6zH+wiQs+1wfj8IucZLbZz91d2qrAaGEyisftzM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=D8rIxGkTB/pupC5KG6W4CZAVHhWyCGEQw8u8cyLweSpqn0mrcSVkKejMj7hXsUXD8 mj6NfnxuZkt6N9A+PTtw1JUWYCDFT2jx8VfaGCUf/IpTePvtaFoS84CT9sDmDNOrOY ZMhzB1ydSPALb1RpQoHn5GRKBZGQU6pOF5kCpPwc= Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:11:59 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Jack Qiu Message-ID: References: <20201130073719.8982-1-jack.qiu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201130073719.8982-1-jack.qiu@huawei.com> X-Headers-End: 1kjeGz-00BDUH-Ly Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: init dirty_secmap incorrectly X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 03:37:19PM +0800, Jack Qiu wrote: > section is dirty, but dirty_secmap may not set > > Reported-by: Jia Yang > Fixes: da52f8ade40b ("f2fs: get the right gc victim section when section > has several segments") > > Signed-off-by: Jack Qiu > --- > v2: > - cc stable mailing list > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel