From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4A1C433B4 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 04:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0409613FB for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 04:06:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E0409613FB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZQc3-00042e-HS; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 04:06:47 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZQc2-00042X-Ne for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 04:06:46 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dYROMTxkIYSZ5w7ACDcSncWjAGZeaVlAjcJjEKxGLbU=; b=mmFNHXFhg78rQtJy3myAVsbv5Q aWiWomgi1qP6/FXzuimcvYXODKpgewOBLQgQlJklyxLt9ivFSL73XSLirCtTXgPSymEpNhpSA3SKA 0XQIwfpOueOGoZ55H9wIZe6Phat9A5zr22DunTtKxCNnKtHQ8ObNOMvaZ+SklftVtCyE=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dYROMTxkIYSZ5w7ACDcSncWjAGZeaVlAjcJjEKxGLbU=; b=FbOdxtSXO/dt/wnuXYOT2ZvRC/ MriCj33NEQehbmtOJ898QNlILmOb1i9//Ir8hM4ZDn+2RPgzK8dA1kxspJZhfnPjC3ERYyT3VjtSy SPr7esCokDIxuv/cps60jVhXTQg2nSikZedZk98gDW6UGCEPUhydZfMJQa1blNYDJK4Q=; Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1lZQbz-00AvPN-W1 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 04:06:47 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47ADA6144A; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 04:06:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1619064398; bh=L4WeoQdEQp2U/UEJoCYX740XlkPBG+zGkFUwUApdLoQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=M6AF+kqoI0Qh46XYc31ul6i2VacORJiOre7HYr45y75VBMz8jKf9m4zsLN+Mpya+p o4H5lIoYO5Z2SyNNWvdprycN8QCQrPSKjlR+gj4pRpVx2Ybo9QJFMcJYuPD0PjZUXF CYioxVcQsc+uD87OdeLwxpzCuzKQEPdsoLIkOKYxq+vZvtZejrwYCZDaW6SN9rmfnF ptpq7CrRrYsqwrFHaNxZZMggJeYrz7p1iUkOAQXxVzSgjDYWDBs/PUKl0c0ewXhMny hu8i6nHu6bAQ0K8/6QIdiQrct8rEkGuzB0xFVWBdX1q/bWILg1Ve37rRmj/W8Wt5Ae UZIZLUFfTvNgg== Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 21:06:36 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Chao Yu Message-ID: References: <20210416095838.29568-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210416095838.29568-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> X-Headers-End: 1lZQbz-00AvPN-W1 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH] f2fs: reduce expensive checkpoint trigger frequency X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 04/16, Chao Yu wrote: > We may trigger high frequent checkpoint for below case: > 1. mkdir /mnt/dir1; set dir1 encrypted > 2. touch /mnt/file1; fsync /mnt/file1 > 3. mkdir /mnt/dir2; set dir2 encrypted > 4. touch /mnt/file2; fsync /mnt/file2 > ... > > Although, newly created dir and file are not related, due to > commit bbf156f7afa7 ("f2fs: fix lost xattrs of directories"), we will > trigger checkpoint whenever fsync() comes after a new encrypted dir > created. It'll happen once? How much impact will we hit due to this? > > In order to avoid such condition, let's record an entry including > directory's ino into global cache when we initialize encryption policy > in a checkpointed directory, and then only trigger checkpoint() when > target file's parent has non-persisted encryption policy, for the case > its parent is not checkpointed, need_do_checkpoint() has cover that > by verifying it with f2fs_is_checkpointed_node(). > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > --- > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 ++ > fs/f2fs/file.c | 3 +++ > fs/f2fs/xattr.c | 6 ++++-- > include/trace/events/f2fs.h | 3 ++- > 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > index 87d734f5589d..34487e527d12 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ enum { > APPEND_INO, /* for append ino list */ > UPDATE_INO, /* for update ino list */ > TRANS_DIR_INO, /* for trasactions dir ino list */ > + ENC_DIR_INO, /* for encrypted dir ino list */ > FLUSH_INO, /* for multiple device flushing */ > MAX_INO_ENTRY, /* max. list */ > }; > @@ -1090,6 +1091,7 @@ enum cp_reason_type { > CP_FASTBOOT_MODE, > CP_SPEC_LOG_NUM, > CP_RECOVER_DIR, > + CP_ENC_DIR, > }; > > enum iostat_type { > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c > index 6284b2f4a60b..a6c38d8b1ec3 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c > @@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ static inline enum cp_reason_type need_do_checkpoint(struct inode *inode) > f2fs_exist_written_data(sbi, F2FS_I(inode)->i_pino, > TRANS_DIR_INO)) > cp_reason = CP_RECOVER_DIR; > + else if (f2fs_exist_written_data(sbi, F2FS_I(inode)->i_pino, > + ENC_DIR_INO)) > + cp_reason = CP_ENC_DIR; > > return cp_reason; > } > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/xattr.c b/fs/f2fs/xattr.c > index c8f34decbf8e..38796d488d15 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/xattr.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/xattr.c > @@ -630,6 +630,7 @@ static int __f2fs_setxattr(struct inode *inode, int index, > const char *name, const void *value, size_t size, > struct page *ipage, int flags) > { > + struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode); > struct f2fs_xattr_entry *here, *last; > void *base_addr, *last_base_addr; > int found, newsize; > @@ -745,8 +746,9 @@ static int __f2fs_setxattr(struct inode *inode, int index, > !strcmp(name, F2FS_XATTR_NAME_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT)) > f2fs_set_encrypted_inode(inode); > f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode, true); > - if (!error && S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) > - set_sbi_flag(F2FS_I_SB(inode), SBI_NEED_CP); > + if (!error && S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) && > + f2fs_is_checkpointed_node(sbi, inode->i_ino)) > + f2fs_add_ino_entry(sbi, inode->i_ino, ENC_DIR_INO); Is it right to say ENC_DIR_INO in this case? > > same: > if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_ACL_MODE)) { > diff --git a/include/trace/events/f2fs.h b/include/trace/events/f2fs.h > index 56b113e3cd6a..ca0cf12226e9 100644 > --- a/include/trace/events/f2fs.h > +++ b/include/trace/events/f2fs.h > @@ -145,7 +145,8 @@ TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(CP_RESIZE); > { CP_NODE_NEED_CP, "node needs cp" }, \ > { CP_FASTBOOT_MODE, "fastboot mode" }, \ > { CP_SPEC_LOG_NUM, "log type is 2" }, \ > - { CP_RECOVER_DIR, "dir needs recovery" }) > + { CP_RECOVER_DIR, "dir needs recovery" }, \ > + { CP_ENC_DIR, "persist encryption policy" }) > > #define show_shutdown_mode(type) \ > __print_symbolic(type, \ > -- > 2.29.2 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel