From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: return -EPERM given generic mask
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 07:39:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJlFs5DLGifyBR2G@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YJTdp0Rj170TYm24@sol.localdomain>
On 05/06, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 12:13:47PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > In f2fs_fileattr_set(),
> >
> > if (!fa->flags_valid)
> > mask &= FS_COMMON_FL;
> >
> > In this case, we should not allow to set FS_COMPR_FL, instead of BUG_ON.
> >
> > /* Flags shared betwen flags/xflags */
> > (FS_SYNC_FL | FS_IMMUTABLE_FL | FS_APPEND_FL | \
> > FS_NODUMP_FL | FS_NOATIME_FL | FS_DAX_FL | \
> > FS_PROJINHERIT_FL)
> >
> > Fixes: 4c5b47997521 ("vfs: add fileattr ops")
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/file.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > index e01ce802cf10..38015ef84893 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > @@ -1817,7 +1817,9 @@ static int f2fs_setflags_common(struct inode *inode, u32 iflags, u32 mask)
> > struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode);
> > u32 masked_flags = fi->i_flags & mask;
> >
> > - f2fs_bug_on(F2FS_I_SB(inode), (iflags & ~mask));
> > + /* mask can be shrunk by flags_valid selector */
> > + if (iflags & ~mask)
> > + return -EPERM;
> >
> > /* Is it quota file? Do not allow user to mess with it */
> > if (IS_NOQUOTA(inode))
> > --
> > 2.31.1.607.g51e8a6a459-goog
>
> This looks like the wrong fix. AFAICS, 'mask' is the set of inode flags that
> the specific ioctl (FS_IOC_SETFLAGS or FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR) can potentially
> modify, while 'iflags' is the new set of inode flags among the set that either
> ioctl can potentially modify. So this change will stop FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR from
> working on files that have already flags set which are only modifiable by
> FS_IOC_SETFLAGS, e.g. the compression flag.
>
> I think the correct fix would be to just do something like 'iflags &= mask'.
Thanks. Let me send v2.
>
> - Eric
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-10 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-06 19:13 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: return -EPERM given generic mask Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-07 6:26 ` Eric Biggers
2021-05-10 14:39 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2021-05-10 14:42 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: support iflag change given the mask Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-10 22:28 ` Eric Biggers
2021-05-11 0:21 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-05-11 1:43 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YJlFs5DLGifyBR2G@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).