From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] fscrypt: fix derivation of SipHash keys on big endian CPUs
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 19:25:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMLJjT97wHh4XJiZ@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210605075033.54424-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 12:50:33AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
>
> Typically, the cryptographic APIs that fscrypt uses take keys as byte
> arrays, which avoids endianness issues. However, siphash_key_t is an
> exception. It is defined as 'u64 key[2];', i.e. the 128-bit key is
> expected to be given directly as two 64-bit words in CPU endianness.
>
> fscrypt_derive_dirhash_key() and fscrypt_setup_iv_ino_lblk_32_key()
> forgot to take this into account. Therefore, the SipHash keys used to
> index encrypted+casefolded directories differ on big endian vs. little
> endian platforms, as do the SipHash keys used to hash inode numbers for
> IV_INO_LBLK_32-encrypted directories. This makes such directories
> non-portable between these platforms.
>
> Fix this by always using the little endian order. This is a breaking
> change for big endian platforms, but this should be fine in practice
> since these features (encrypt+casefold support, and the IV_INO_LBLK_32
> flag) aren't known to actually be used on any big endian platforms yet.
>
> Fixes: aa408f835d02 ("fscrypt: derive dirhash key for casefolded directories")
> Fixes: e3b1078bedd3 ("fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.6+
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> ---
>
> v2: Fixed fscrypt_setup_iv_ino_lblk_32_key() too, not just
> fscrypt_derive_dirhash_key().
>
> fs/crypto/keysetup.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
Applied to fscrypt.git#master for 5.14.
- Eric
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-11 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-05 7:50 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] fscrypt: fix derivation of SipHash keys on big endian CPUs Eric Biggers
2021-06-11 2:25 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YMLJjT97wHh4XJiZ@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=drosen@google.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).