From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 RFC] f2fs: fix to force keeping write barrier for strict fsync mode
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 10:10:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YN32/NsjqJONbvz7@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210601101024.119356-1-yuchao0@huawei.com>
On 06/01, Chao Yu wrote:
> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg15126.html
>
> As [1] reported, if lower device doesn't support write barrier, in below
> case:
>
> - write page #0; persist
> - overwrite page #0
> - fsync
> - write data page #0 OPU into device's cache
> - write inode page into device's cache
> - issue flush
Well, we have preflush for node writes, so I don't think this is the case.
fio.op_flags |= REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FUA;
>
> If SPO is triggered during flush command, inode page can be persisted
> before data page #0, so that after recovery, inode page can be recovered
> with new physical block address of data page #0, however there may
> contains dummy data in new physical block address.
>
> Then what user will see is: after overwrite & fsync + SPO, old data in
> file was corrupted, if any user do care about such case, we can suggest
> user to use STRICT fsync mode, in this mode, we will force to trigger
> preflush command to persist data in device cache in prior to node
> writeback, it avoids potential data corruption during fsync().
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - fix this by adding additional preflush command rather than using
> atomic write flow.
> fs/f2fs/file.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index 7d5311d54f63..238ca2a733ac 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -301,6 +301,20 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
> f2fs_exist_written_data(sbi, ino, UPDATE_INO))
> goto flush_out;
> goto out;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * for OPU case, during fsync(), node can be persisted before
> + * data when lower device doesn't support write barrier, result
> + * in data corruption after SPO.
> + * So for strict fsync mode, force to trigger preflush to keep
> + * data/node write order to avoid potential data corruption.
> + */
> + if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fsync_mode == FSYNC_MODE_STRICT &&
> + !atomic) {
> + ret = f2fs_issue_flush(sbi, inode->i_ino);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
> go_write:
> /*
> --
> 2.29.2
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-01 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-01 10:10 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 RFC] f2fs: fix to force keeping write barrier for strict fsync mode Chao Yu
2021-06-03 16:00 ` Chao Yu
2021-06-07 23:32 ` Chao Yu
2021-07-01 17:10 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2021-07-01 23:04 ` Chao Yu
2021-07-02 1:32 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-07-02 15:49 ` Chao Yu
2021-07-07 17:48 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-07-13 9:23 ` Chao Yu
2021-07-13 23:34 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-07-14 1:15 ` Chao Yu
2021-07-14 2:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-07-14 2:51 ` Chao Yu
2021-07-19 18:38 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YN32/NsjqJONbvz7@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).