From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: Chao Yu <chao.yu@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix to force keeping write barrier for strict fsync mode
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:15:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPYjzAVq04LfUO2Y@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210720010329.3975-1-chao@kernel.org>
Wasn't it supposed to be v1?
On 07/20, Chao Yu wrote:
> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg15126.html
>
> As [1] reported, if lower device doesn't support write barrier, in below
> case:
>
> - write page #0; persist
> - overwrite page #0
> - fsync
> - write data page #0 OPU into device's cache
> - write inode page into device's cache
> - issue flush
>
> If SPO is triggered during flush command, inode page can be persisted
> before data page #0, so that after recovery, inode page can be recovered
> with new physical block address of data page #0, however there may
> contains dummy data in new physical block address.
>
> Then what user will see is: after overwrite & fsync + SPO, old data in
> file was corrupted, if any user do care about such case, we can suggest
> user to use STRICT fsync mode, in this mode, we will force to use atomic
> write sematics to keep write order in between data/node and last node,
> so that it avoids potential data corruption during fsync().
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/file.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index 6afd4562335f..00b45876eaa1 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -301,6 +301,18 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
> f2fs_exist_written_data(sbi, ino, UPDATE_INO))
> goto flush_out;
> goto out;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * for OPU case, during fsync(), node can be persisted before
> + * data when lower device doesn't support write barrier, result
> + * in data corruption after SPO.
> + * So for strict fsync mode, force to use atomic write sematics
> + * to keep write order in between data/node and last node to
> + * avoid potential data corruption.
> + */
> + if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fsync_mode ==
> + FSYNC_MODE_STRICT && !atomic)
> + atomic = true;
> }
> go_write:
> /*
> --
> 2.22.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-20 1:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-20 1:03 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix to force keeping write barrier for strict fsync mode Chao Yu
2021-07-20 1:15 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2021-07-20 1:19 ` Chao Yu
2021-07-29 1:41 ` Chao Yu
2021-07-30 22:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YPYjzAVq04LfUO2Y@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=chao.yu@linux.dev \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).