From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB05AC433F5 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nCU5D-0000l3-Fz; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:14:34 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nCU5C-0000kx-Bg for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:14:32 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=r2sq8NNfQfbWI8wK6CCJvSQBlG7rZ5GBhPXi5DbZCSQ=; b=FkLT8FKQz6WgvRMbVjaXtDWCgK 9fkPO2wr5YVtPunZbw3wQzpV+FwlWkbJL3ofyfCJJ22/Ua7RvETREJTPKsw+HyK594ynwWRLXc6lV sn4+u2prU2w4lhYZjiMXUGI6g3Tn7ygubB5rTduVoFyvm+xPt72ijY2ltH9T2FTSRVgs=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=r2sq8NNfQfbWI8wK6CCJvSQBlG7rZ5GBhPXi5DbZCSQ=; b=gXCGR1fvuExcODepF11LBQKtD1 Yc+6UiVlY9+kHn/QQWZ+SjtKIA8mZgUjU8Yp5fewV3uY0uvQNm9wO+w2oM6A3qNBdVhAv6/D9hwAA OzMxhG/InDdSRw6mUL8BAeFbTzR9hSI5+a+J2LZD9Z4ZuBnX9ewRbKeMfLDH1QYv8iCs=; Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) id 1nCU56-0001P9-OI for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:14:32 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A61F0B81AC6; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56ED3C340E0; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:14:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1643148856; bh=wzQ7De1OASBwcj3eJi86mBXPWkiGQw8ikhGXdFZuX4s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CD6N+fucU5W+Oe0l9yslZOos70un8YyAOxgmEVyiljOD5LNiUrrshae3qKmqz/UfW zRo5ffiEfJbWjIcVeOeKFBVlfi8vThLQ4Dp7jTb25WDhtEwOg+GO8zQJV0sgnYoc7B zUBR3soAR5Uil1cGxJO4zU/P2+yKngc3sDIJFNcBvovrpmW1Iv9kvRVwMBCQVDwATl hF6ATYuwsiQq+b8Tc4GiWzJMQISjrXzgNWvEqpruia1PUZaQu8HmvOW10mpVu3jwoz Oo1lIDqQOZbnTen10a52SgQm6goBIQ4PCtwIU9xzZ5vRJTkrP6ydheCM6WG71/qvO3 j2hYTsaW5tIcg== Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 22:13:58 +0000 From: Eric Biggers To: Harry Austen Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Headers-End: 1nCU56-0001P9-OI Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix fileattr_set unsupported attribute handling X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 10:01:49PM +0000, Harry Austen wrote: > On Monday, 24 January 2022 19:25:44 GMT Eric Biggers wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 12:59:03PM +0000, Harry Austen wrote: > > > FS_IOC_SETFLAGS ioctl should return EOPNOTSUPP if the file attribute > > > (e.g. FS_NOCOW_FL) is not supported, rather than silently ignoring it > > > and returning success. > > > > > > Fixes: 9b1bb01c8ae7 (f2fs: convert to fileattr) > > > Signed-off-by: Harry Austen > > > --- > > > > > > fs/f2fs/file.c | 3 +-- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c > > > index 92ec2699bc85..061bf35c2582 100644 > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c > > > @@ -3085,9 +3085,8 @@ int f2fs_fileattr_set(struct user_namespace > > > *mnt_userns,> > > > return -EIO; > > > > > > if (!f2fs_is_checkpoint_ready(F2FS_I_SB(inode))) > > > > > > return -ENOSPC; > > > > > > - if (fsflags & ~F2FS_GETTABLE_FS_FL) > > > + if (fsflags & ~F2FS_SETTABLE_FS_FL) > > > > > > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > > > > - fsflags &= F2FS_SETTABLE_FS_FL; > > > > > > if (!fa->flags_valid) > > > > > > mask &= FS_COMMON_FL; > > > > This is intentional, and matches what ext4 does; see the comment in the ext4 > > implementation of this: > > > > /* > > * chattr(1) grabs flags via GETFLAGS, modifies the result and > > * passes that to SETFLAGS. So we cannot easily make SETFLAGS > > * more restrictive than just silently masking off visible but > > * not settable flags as we always did. > > */ > > Ah, my apologies. I thought it looked a little too obvious. Clearly I > should have looked at the ext4 code. Please disregard this patch. > > Is there anything else that could be done to improve unsettable > attribute handling? For example, is there a reason FS_NOCOW_FL is > gettable but not settable? Could it be added to the settable list? A lot of flags are gettable by FS_IOC_GETFLAGS but not settable by FS_IOC_SETFLAGS, typically because they can only be set through a dedicated interface. For example, the encrypt flag can only be set using FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY, or via inheritance. > > > > Also, even if this patch was correct, the Fixes tag is wrong. > > Having looked at this a bit more, I assume you are saying this due to > the missing double quotes around the commit summary? (just so I know for > next time as this is my first attempt at sending a kernel patch) > There's that, but more importantly the commit you listed is wrong. The relevant code was added by an earlier commit, and that commit just moved it. - Eric _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel