linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: don't check IPU policy during file defragment
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:50:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yfs09i06EZASuLGI@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d5851f31-6eec-e00c-5412-59496c2c849e@kernel.org>

On 01/29, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2022/1/29 8:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 01/28, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > Once IPU policy is enabled in some cases:
> > > a) f2fs forces to use F2FS_IPU_FORCE in a small-sized volume
> > > b) user configures IPU policy via sysfs
> > 
> > It's contradictory to each other. How about just letting users decide to do what
> > they want to do? IOWs, if user wants to do defrag, they should change ipu_policy
> > on the fly.
> 
> How about the case user wants to do defrag for specified files, and also use
> ipu_policy for other common writes?
> 
> IMO, it may be not completely contradictory, if we try to treat userspace defraging
> requirement as specified OPU requirement, like kernel-side OPU requirement from
> node write or GC write.
> 
> Or maybe we can introduce a new ipu_policy which allow triggering OPU when defraging
> triggered from userspace?

OPU is the default as F2FS was originated from LFS. Then, IPU was added to
improve performance in some cases to avoid node updates. IPU_FORCE was added
to enforce IPU all the time. So, I think you can add another IPU bit which
can relax IPU_FORCE.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Then we may fail to defragment file via ioctl due to IPU policy check,
> > > it doesn't make sense, so let's change to use IPU policy for common
> > > data writeback, rather than for specific data writeback, e.g. GC,
> > > defragment, and so on.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >   fs/f2fs/data.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> > >   fs/f2fs/f2fs.h |  3 ++-
> > >   fs/f2fs/file.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> > >   3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > index 0f124e8de1d4..bce7ecac8976 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > > @@ -2530,6 +2530,9 @@ bool f2fs_should_update_outplace(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
> > >   	if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_ALIGNED_WRITE))
> > >   		return true;
> > > +	if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_DEFRAG_PROCESS))
> > > +		return true;
> > > +
> > >   	if (fio) {
> > >   		if (page_private_gcing(fio->page))
> > >   			return true;
> > > @@ -3154,8 +3157,8 @@ static int __f2fs_write_data_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> > >   			f2fs_available_free_memory(sbi, DIRTY_DENTS))
> > >   		goto skip_write;
> > > -	/* skip writing during file defragment */
> > > -	if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_DO_DEFRAG))
> > > +	/* skip writing in file defragment preparing stage */
> > > +	if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_DEFRAG_PREPARE))
> > >   		goto skip_write;
> > >   	trace_f2fs_writepages(mapping->host, wbc, DATA);
> > > @@ -3733,7 +3736,7 @@ static int f2fs_migrate_blocks(struct inode *inode, block_t start_blk,
> > >   		f2fs_allocate_new_section(sbi, CURSEG_COLD_DATA_PINNED, false);
> > >   		f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
> > > -		set_inode_flag(inode, FI_DO_DEFRAG);
> > > +		set_inode_flag(inode, FI_DEFRAG_PREPARE);
> > >   		for (blkofs = 0; blkofs < blk_per_sec; blkofs++) {
> > >   			struct page *page;
> > > @@ -3750,9 +3753,11 @@ static int f2fs_migrate_blocks(struct inode *inode, block_t start_blk,
> > >   			f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> > >   		}
> > > -		clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_DO_DEFRAG);
> > > +		clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_DEFRAG_PREPARE);
> > > +		set_inode_flag(inode, FI_DEFRAG_PROCESS);
> > >   		ret = filemap_fdatawrite(inode->i_mapping);
> > > +		clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_DEFRAG_PROCESS);
> > >   		f2fs_up_write(&sbi->pin_sem);
> > > @@ -3761,7 +3766,7 @@ static int f2fs_migrate_blocks(struct inode *inode, block_t start_blk,
> > >   	}
> > >   done:
> > > -	clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_DO_DEFRAG);
> > > +	clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_DEFRAG_PREPARE);
> > >   	clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_ALIGNED_WRITE);
> > >   	filemap_invalidate_unlock(inode->i_mapping);
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > > index 8178a9152e49..4b905059a81e 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > > @@ -733,7 +733,8 @@ enum {
> > >   	FI_DROP_CACHE,		/* drop dirty page cache */
> > >   	FI_DATA_EXIST,		/* indicate data exists */
> > >   	FI_INLINE_DOTS,		/* indicate inline dot dentries */
> > > -	FI_DO_DEFRAG,		/* indicate defragment is running */
> > > +	FI_DEFRAG_PREPARE,	/* indicate defragment is preparing */
> > > +	FI_DEFRAG_PROCESS,	/* indicate defragment is processing */
> > >   	FI_DIRTY_FILE,		/* indicate regular/symlink has dirty pages */
> > >   	FI_PREALLOCATED_ALL,	/* all blocks for write were preallocated */
> > >   	FI_HOT_DATA,		/* indicate file is hot */
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > > index 6ccdd6e347e2..696f4a175228 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > > @@ -2559,10 +2559,6 @@ static int f2fs_defragment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > >   	bool fragmented = false;
> > >   	int err;
> > > -	/* if in-place-update policy is enabled, don't waste time here */
> > > -	if (f2fs_should_update_inplace(inode, NULL))
> > > -		return -EINVAL;
> > > -
> > >   	pg_start = range->start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > >   	pg_end = (range->start + range->len) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > @@ -2570,6 +2566,11 @@ static int f2fs_defragment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > >   	inode_lock(inode);
> > > +	if (f2fs_is_pinned_file(inode)) {
> > > +		err = -EINVAL;
> > > +		goto out;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > >   	/* writeback all dirty pages in the range */
> > >   	err = filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping, range->start,
> > >   						range->start + range->len - 1);
> > > @@ -2651,7 +2652,7 @@ static int f2fs_defragment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > >   			goto check;
> > >   		}
> > > -		set_inode_flag(inode, FI_DO_DEFRAG);
> > > +		set_inode_flag(inode, FI_DEFRAG_PREPARE);
> > >   		idx = map.m_lblk;
> > >   		while (idx < map.m_lblk + map.m_len && cnt < blk_per_seg) {
> > > @@ -2676,14 +2677,16 @@ static int f2fs_defragment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > >   		if (map.m_lblk < pg_end && cnt < blk_per_seg)
> > >   			goto do_map;
> > > -		clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_DO_DEFRAG);
> > > +		clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_DEFRAG_PREPARE);
> > > +		set_inode_flag(inode, FI_DEFRAG_PROCESS);
> > >   		err = filemap_fdatawrite(inode->i_mapping);
> > > +		clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_DEFRAG_PROCESS);
> > >   		if (err)
> > >   			goto out;
> > >   	}
> > >   clear_out:
> > > -	clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_DO_DEFRAG);
> > > +	clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_DEFRAG_PREPARE);
> > >   out:
> > >   	inode_unlock(inode);
> > >   	if (!err)
> > > -- 
> > > 2.25.1


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2022-02-03  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-28  9:19 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: don't check IPU policy during file defragment Chao Yu
2022-01-29  0:35 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-01-29  1:39   ` Chao Yu
2022-02-03  1:50     ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yfs09i06EZASuLGI@google.com \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).