From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2792C433F5 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nUGPm-00082F-RW; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:17:17 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nUGPl-000824-HO for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:17:16 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=T8NHY9pRBMJRozBbHMf7+44GpQlsyMoj1a7G5NXC0aY=; b=AkIYc34eKMB/Ks9PbMGLY7MuAV /vXyb1z/U8JyMTWDRLS2dWlSSPZl2C/AY9K141Ix4SiLsjXHzJScwr8ecWxffDx7W2tIogqMdwDTH a+6vbwXJ8FNqngkfzSsQ9ro7FfXGiZAA6LNUlDyhi6O9buGEZlu+YqTlkWwTLztAElQc=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=T8NHY9pRBMJRozBbHMf7+44GpQlsyMoj1a7G5NXC0aY=; b=DY2mvLfh42pU7MtZghQa1ORWP6 ZdQd2w++n4PYp+g0KYojEO1hUcUVjXQuglhUg8kHRwSJVZeG98go1j0SzkKLsDZFuP3UZ1t3tWwLR NKJ1tCJW2uJM71mZdH7inciyXb094Bp+oYakCYAVrlbmT2SIisTRJUYfxlUXnLdAn12Q=; Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.94.2) id 1nUGPi-000CWm-Nu for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:17:15 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D4CC60EA9; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 20:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF012C340E8; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 20:49:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1647377393; bh=tmCTZxNaEDn+PVcozc1A9P7Clu/jLzwOHTl9ZhO4sHU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=I4rHT9YaWazYatr815WtpiPsOvd6FVuzOFjEOf4wNkLrecFWG+E9FOnK7Ms2SII3g JBYsjoLxKbRw+NLJEKD1+pQJ817Dx89aHWvkd9Gu+IDB7Np6bl586z8HFMtoM2bOOo AAk60DrL/sPU0mILSOpyYHsHYBC6bIg+SNCmykyDidTOzllj4GdDK6Kg4d6/mhROl4 5BDNlgHnTJpARjOhFCWkzy8H1c1v0GVtR1CEACkLHEykJtaFmdwQV78wWaxDRfEH9V f3k/M5IMKMLqvf1ENG/BR1EGNDUdXp+Z9uVkxjtUOwQIPYOfWeM9f1T9MkFiZDlwk4 zhlpJ7159vu6g== Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 13:49:52 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Juhyung Park Message-ID: References: <15c6c075-7ed1-db3d-e9a3-d2beaa48577f@kernel.org> <376d12ed-afd0-41d7-495c-054bfd24d5d1@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Headers-End: 1nUGPi-000CWm-Nu Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] EIO returned when reading files from R/O, compressed f2fs image X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 03/15, Juhyung Park wrote: > Here's strace from both commands right after drop_caches. > > cp: https://pastebin.com/raw/GH51BjV4 > tar: https://pastebin.com/raw/0wgiu7fE Can we catch who sets EIO? # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/f2fs/f2fs_readpage/enable # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/f2fs/f2fs_readpages/enable # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/f2fs/f2fs_decompress_pages_start/enable # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/f2fs/f2fs_decompress_pages_end/enable # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/tracing_on # cat /sys/kernel/tracing/trace_pipe > > It seems that cp is calling a few extra fadvise and ioctl. > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 7:25 PM Juhyung Park wrote: > > > > Hi Chao, > > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 5:45 PM Chao Yu wrote: > > > > > > Hi Juhyung, > > > > > > On 2022/3/15 16:37, Juhyung Park wrote: > > > > Hi Chao, > > > > > > > > I actually have never used compression on f2fs yet and this image is > > > > from an unmodified firmware taken directly from the OTA server, not > > > > made by me. > > > > > > Alright. > > > > > > > > > > > If you can tell me how to check if the file is compressed or not, I'll > > > > run it and report back. > > > > > > lsattr |grep c > > > > > > You can check the flag's mean in manual of chattr. > > > > Ah, didn't know that lsattr shows compressed state. > > It seems that every single file under that system partition is > > compressed except ones with file size of < 4096, but the error only > > happens on select files. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never had this sort of issue (a lot of multiple readers causing > > > > troubles) before with a regular R/W, uncompressed f2fs partition, so > > > > I'm guessing it has something to do with RO or compression feature. > > > > > > Agreed, maybe we can repacking image to RO one or compressed one to > > > check which one can cause this issue? > > > > Is this easy to do standalone? > > > > AOSP's ext4 image creation was already super complicated to do > > out-of-tree with their dedup and minimizing file size (so that the > > resulting image is as small as possible) thinggies going on. I think > > I've seen EROFS support but I don't know how f2fs system images are > > handled under AOSP. > > > > Also, I moved the environment to my personal laptop. It's running > > v5.15.28 with the latest f2fs-stable/linux-5.15.y merged and it still > > happens there. > > > > One weird thing that I've been able to confirm is that it seems that > > multiple readers are not the problem: > > #!/bin/bash > > > > set -v > > > > APK=system/app/some_app/some_app.apk > > > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches > > tar -pcf - $APK | cat > /dev/null # Works! > > cp $APK /tmp # Works! > > > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches > > tar -pcf - $APK | cat > /dev/null # Works! > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches > > cp $APK /tmp # cp: error reading > > 'system/app/some_app/some_app.apk': Input/output error > > > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches > > cp $APK /tmp # cp: error reading > > 'system/app/some_app/some_app.apk': Input/output error > > tar -pcf - $APK | cat > /dev/null # tar: > > system/app/some_app/some_app.apk: File shrank by 3375397 bytes; > > padding with zeros > > > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches > > cp $APK /tmp # cp: error reading > > 'system/app/some_app/some_app.apk': Input/output error > > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches > > tar -pcf - $APK | cat > /dev/null # Works! > > > > I'm guessing some system-calls that cp use causes f2fs to malfunction. > > (GNU tar is smart enough to detect if the output is /dev/null, so it > > skips the actual file read when it is piped directly to /dev/null, so > > I added `cat` in between.) > > > > Hope this new info helps. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 5:33 PM Chao Yu wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On 2022/3/14 1:52, Juhyung Park wrote: > > > >>> Hi. > > > >>> > > > >>> We have a production server storing some Android firmwares over a ZFS > > > >>> file-system, and we noticed some issues when extracting firmware files > > > >>> that use f2fs for Android system partitions. > > > >>> > > > >>> This is a proprietary environment, so I cannot disclose every detail, > > > >>> so I hope you understand. I'll try to elaborate as much as I can. > > > >>> > > > >>> The server is running Ubuntu 20.04 with Linux v5.15 (recently upgraded > > > >>> from v5.13 after noticing RO feature added on v5.14 being required). > > > >>> We have a set of scripts extracting Android firmware files. The input > > > >>> is typically the OTA zip file and after going through the script, it > > > >>> extracts every file and binary image from a given file. > > > >>> > > > >>> So that includes extracting super (dynamic partition), ext4 system > > > >>> partitions with dedup enabled, and now, f2fs system partitions with RO > > > >>> and compression enabled. > > > >>> > > > >>> Our script never had to deal with f2fs before as we only started > > > >>> seeing f2fs system partitions with recently released devices. > > > >>> > > > >>> This is the f2fs mount flag after mounting with `mount -o ro > > > >>> system.raw /some/dir`: > > > >>> ro,relatime,lazytime,background_gc=on,discard,no_heap,user_xattr,inline_xattr,acl,inline_data,inline_dentry,extent_cache,mode=adaptive,active_logs=2,alloc_mode=reuse,checkpoint_merge,fsync_mode=posix,compress_algorithm=lz4,compress_log_size=2,compress_mode=fs,discard_unit=block > > > >>> > > > >>> There are *a lot* of files in Android firmware these days, so we try > > > >>> to parallelize parts when we can. > > > >>> > > > >>> This is a snippet of the script: > > > >>> ``` > > > >>> #!/bin/bash > > > >>> <...> > > > >>> RSYNC="rsync -ahAXx --inplace --numeric-ids" > > > >>> <...> > > > >>> for val in system vendor product odm; do > > > >>> if ! ls images/$val.raw > /dev/null 2>&1; then continue; fi > > > >>> > > > >>> mkdir -p fs > > > >>> cd fs > > > >>> > > > >>> mkdir -p $val.mount tmp_$val > > > >>> mount -o ro ../images/$val.raw $val.mount > > > >>> > > > >>> $RSYNC $val.mount/ "$DEST_PWD/fs/$val/" & > > > >>> echo $! > $val.pid > > > >>> disown > > > >>> > > > >>> cd $val.mount > > > >>> find . -type d -exec mkdir -p "$DEST_PWD/strings/$val/"{} \; > > > >>> find . -type d -exec mkdir -p "../tmp_$val/"{} \; > > > >>> > > > >>> while read file; do strings "$file" > "$DEST_PWD/strings/$val/$file" > > > >>> & done < <(find . -type f | grep -v '\.apk\|\.jar\|\.zip') > > > >>> wait > > > >>> > > > >>> <...> > > > >>> > > > >>> cd ../ > > > >>> rm -rf tmp_$val > > > >>> cd ../ > > > >>> done > > > >>> > > > >>> wait > > > >>> <...> > > > >>> for val in system vendor product odm; do > > > >>> if ! ls images/$val.raw > /dev/null 2>&1; then continue; fi > > > >>> tail --pid=$(cat fs/$val.pid) -f /dev/null > > > >>> umount fs/$val.mount > > > >>> rmdir fs/$val.mount > > > >>> rm -f images/$val.img images/$val.raw 2>/dev/null > > > >>> done > > > >>> ``` > > > >>> > > > >>> The offending part is: > > > >>> ``` > > > >>> $RSYNC $val.mount/ "$DEST_PWD/fs/$val/" & > > > >>> find . -type d -exec mkdir -p "$DEST_PWD/strings/$val/"{} \; > > > >>> find . -type d -exec mkdir -p "../tmp_$val/"{} \; > > > >>> while read file; do strings "$file" > "$DEST_PWD/strings/$val/$file" > > > >>> & done < <(find . -type f | grep -v '\.apk\|\.jar\|\.zip') > > > >>> wait > > > >>> ``` > > > >>> > > > >>> When that part is reached, the script forks thousands of new processes > > > >>> and starts reading from f2fs. (We simply decided to rely on Linux's > > > >>> task scheduler and didn't bother to limit the number of > > > >>> sub-processes.) > > > >>> > > > >>> I am able to reliably cause f2fs to return EIO on some files: > > > >>> cp: error reading './system/priv-app/some_apk_1/some_apk_1.apk': > > > >>> Input/output error > > > >>> cp: error reading './system/priv-app/some_apk_2/some_apk_2.apk': > > > >>> Input/output error > > > >>> cp: error reading './system/priv-app/some_apk_3/some_apk_3.apk': > > > >>> Input/output error > > > >>> rsync: [sender] read errors mapping > > > >>> "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_1/some_apk_1.apk": > > > >>> Input/output error (5) > > > >>> rsync: [sender] read errors mapping > > > >>> "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_2/some_apk_2.apk": > > > >>> Input/output error (5) > > > >>> rsync: [sender] read errors mapping > > > >>> "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_3/some_apk_3.apk": > > > >>> Input/output error (5) > > > >>> rsync: [sender] read errors mapping > > > >>> "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_1/some_apk_1.apk": > > > >>> Input/output error (5) > > > >>> ERROR: system/priv-app/some_apk_1/some_apk_1.apk failed verification > > > >>> -- update retained. > > > >>> rsync: [sender] read errors mapping > > > >>> "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_2/some_apk_2.apk": > > > >>> Input/output error (5) > > > >>> ERROR: system/priv-app/some_apk_2/some_apk_2.apk failed verification > > > >>> -- update retained. > > > >>> rsync: [sender] read errors mapping > > > >>> "/ssd/some_firmware.zip/fs/system.mount/system/priv-app/some_apk_3/some_apk_3.apk": > > > >>> Input/output error (5) > > > >>> ERROR: system/priv-app/some_apk_3/some_apk_3.apk failed verification > > > >>> -- update retained. > > > >>> rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous > > > >>> errors) (code 23) at main.c(1333) [sender=v3.2.3-45-ga28c4558] > > > >> > > > >> Hi Juhyung, > > > >> > > > >> Do you enable compression on specified files? if so, do all EIOs come from compressed > > > >> file? > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >>> The dmesg remains silent. > > > >>> > > > >>> When I modify the script a little bit and force it to run in a > > > >>> single-thread (by removing &), it runs well. > > > >>> > > > >>> I was able to confirm that it isn't a memory issue. The server has > > > >>> 50G+ of free memory, and the issue is still reliably reproducible when > > > >>> I defragment the memory by dropping caches and doing `echo 1 > > > > >>> /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory`. > > > >>> > > > >>> I wasn't able to test any recent kernels (v5.16 or v5.17) as it's > > > >>> unsupported by ZFS. And it being a production server, I am somewhat > > > >>> limited in dabbling around the kernel. > > > >>> > > > >>> I am planning to test a new kernel with v5.15 + > > > >>> f2fs-stable/linux-5.15.y merged. Meanwhile, if this is a new report or > > > >>> fixed with newer commits, I'd appreciate a tip. > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > > >>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > > > >>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel