From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: keep io_flags to avoid IO split due to different op_flags in two fio holders
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 15:47:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yl88F3RVRMfwyB7+@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d22c42f8-525a-a0a6-2fef-a43b2fc3a2c7@kernel.org>
On 04/17, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2022/4/13 23:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Let's attach io_flags to bio only, so that we can merge IOs given original
> > io_flags only.
> >
> > Fixes: 64bf0eef0171 ("f2fs: pass the bio operation to bio_alloc_bioset")
>
> Nice catch.
>
> Wasn't this bug introduced by:
I don't think so.
>
> commit da9953b729c1 ("f2fs: introduce sysfs/data_io_flag to attach REQ_META/FUA")
>
> static void __attach_data_io_flag(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
> {
> ...
> if ((1 << fio->temp) & meta_flag)
> fio->op_flags |= REQ_META;
> if ((1 << fio->temp) & fua_flag)
> fio->op_flags |= REQ_FUA;
> ...
>
> Thanks,
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/data.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > index acc523f893ba..fcf0daa386de 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -387,11 +387,23 @@ int f2fs_target_device_index(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr)
> > return 0;
> > }
> > -static void __attach_io_flag(struct f2fs_io_info *fio, unsigned int io_flag)
> > +static unsigned int f2fs_io_flags(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
> > {
> > unsigned int temp_mask = (1 << NR_TEMP_TYPE) - 1;
> > - unsigned int fua_flag = io_flag & temp_mask;
> > - unsigned int meta_flag = (io_flag >> NR_TEMP_TYPE) & temp_mask;
> > + unsigned int fua_flag, meta_flag, io_flag;
> > + unsigned int op_flags = 0;
> > +
> > + if (fio->op != REQ_OP_WRITE)
> > + return 0;
> > + if (fio->type == DATA)
> > + io_flag = fio->sbi->data_io_flag;
> > + else if (fio->type == NODE)
> > + io_flag = fio->sbi->node_io_flag;
> > + else
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + fua_flag = io_flag & temp_mask;
> > + meta_flag = (io_flag >> NR_TEMP_TYPE) & temp_mask;
> > /*
> > * data/node io flag bits per temp:
> > @@ -400,9 +412,10 @@ static void __attach_io_flag(struct f2fs_io_info *fio, unsigned int io_flag)
> > * Cold | Warm | Hot | Cold | Warm | Hot |
> > */
> > if ((1 << fio->temp) & meta_flag)
> > - fio->op_flags |= REQ_META;
> > + op_flags |= REQ_META;
> > if ((1 << fio->temp) & fua_flag)
> > - fio->op_flags |= REQ_FUA;
> > + op_flags |= REQ_FUA;
> > + return op_flags;
> > }
> > static struct bio *__bio_alloc(struct f2fs_io_info *fio, int npages)
> > @@ -412,14 +425,10 @@ static struct bio *__bio_alloc(struct f2fs_io_info *fio, int npages)
> > sector_t sector;
> > struct bio *bio;
> > - if (fio->type == DATA)
> > - __attach_io_flag(fio, sbi->data_io_flag);
> > - else if (fio->type == NODE)
> > - __attach_io_flag(fio, sbi->node_io_flag);
> > -
> > bdev = f2fs_target_device(sbi, fio->new_blkaddr, §or);
> > - bio = bio_alloc_bioset(bdev, npages, fio->op | fio->op_flags, GFP_NOIO,
> > - &f2fs_bioset);
> > + bio = bio_alloc_bioset(bdev, npages,
> > + fio->op | fio->op_flags | f2fs_io_flags(fio),
> > + GFP_NOIO, &f2fs_bioset);
> > bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
> > if (is_read_io(fio->op)) {
> > bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_read_end_io;
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-19 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-13 15:49 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: remove obsolete whint_mode Jaegeuk Kim
2022-04-13 15:49 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: keep io_flags to avoid IO split due to different op_flags in two fio holders Jaegeuk Kim
2022-04-17 6:55 ` Chao Yu
2022-04-19 22:47 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2022-04-20 2:45 ` Chao Yu
2022-04-17 6:32 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: remove obsolete whint_mode Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yl88F3RVRMfwyB7+@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).